Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Assessment of patients’ satisfaction and associated factors among outpatients received mental health services at public hospitals of Mekelle Town, northern Ethiopia

International Journal of Mental Health Systems201812:38

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0217-z

  • Received: 24 March 2018
  • Accepted: 5 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Satisfaction is the psychological state that results from confirmation or disconfirmation of expectations with reality. Patients’ satisfaction is a healthcare recipient’s reaction to salient aspect of the contexts, process and result of their service experience. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and associated factors among outpatients receiving mental health services at public hospitals in Mekelle town.

Objectives

To assess patient satisfaction and associated factors among outpatients receiving mental health services at public hospitals in Mekelle town, northern Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among 415 outpatients receiving mental health services at public hospitals in Mekelle town from September 2013 to August 2014. The data were collected using standardized, structured pre-tested questionnaire. Participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Satisfaction rate was examined with the client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8), having four responses ranging from poor to very good. Descriptive summary using percentages, frequency and graph were used to present study results. Multivariate logistic regressions with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength and p-value < 0.05 was used to indicate the significance of the association.

Results

A total of 415 respondents were enrolled, with a response rate of 100% and magnitude of satisfaction of 72%. The predictors associated with patient satisfaction were higher education (AOR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.24, 0.97), longer waiting time (AOR = 0.01; 95% CI 0.002, 0.07), having a diagnosis of psychosis (AOR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.41, 5.72) were significantly associated with satisfaction.

Conclusion and recommendation

More than one-four of patients receiving mental health services were dissatisfied with the service they received. Improvement in accessibility and availability of drugs, minimizing consultation time (< 45 min) or increasing number of OPD units are important to improve satisfaction.

Keywords

  • Satisfaction
  • Factors
  • Psychiatry
  • Outpatient
  • Mental health services

Background

Satisfaction can be defined as the extent of an individual’s experience compared with his or her expectations. It is the psychological state that results from confirmation or disconfirmation of expectations with reality [1]. Patients’ satisfaction is a healthcare recipient’s reaction to salient aspects of the contexts, process, and result of their service experience [2]. Client satisfaction with treatment process may be both influences and be influenced by treatment outcomes. Clients who are not satisfied with a service may have worse outcomes than others. Because, they miss more appointments, leave against advice or fail to follow on treatment plans [2, 3]. Patient satisfaction should be as indispensable to the assessment of quality as to the design and measurement of health care system [4].

Patients’ satisfaction, in particular, is subdivided into an orientation towards care and conditions of care. Orientation towards care represents the patient’s response from the use of a hospital in view of their hope and expectation which is measured by CSQ-8 (client satisfaction questionnaire). The conditions of care represents specific conditions including the method of treatment, the location of the care institution, the waiting time, the payment, the treatment results that are measured by CIC (community interest company questionnaire) [5].

Unlike clinical process measures, which are strictly facility centered, patient satisfaction is ‘patient-centered’ process measures. This is an excellent opportunity to involve patients in the process of evaluating the given service and program. Since they are the best source of information, their experiences often reveal how well a hospital system is operating and can stimulate important insight into kind of changes that are needed to close the chasm between the care provided and the care that should be provided. Patients should be allowed to define their own priority and evaluating their care accordingly, rather than having those criteria selected by other professionals [6].

Patient satisfaction is an integral component of health services. Studies of quality of medical care importance are increasing in importance as a component of health research. Consumer opinion of services is being taken into account in the assessment of quality. Thus evaluating a quality of medical care involves the measurement of its benefits to patients and community at large [7]. Patients’ ratings of their experiences and satisfaction with health services are a frequently used indicator of service quality [8]. However, there is a limited understanding of how psychiatric units contribute to patients’ perceptions of quality [9].

A study conducted in Geneva on patient satisfaction with psychiatric outpatient care reveal that the global satisfaction rate was 93.1%. Whereas the satisfaction level in Africa ranges 55–83%. In Ethiopia, the satisfaction level ranges 57.1–99% [1018]. The most risk factors associated with patient satisfaction are age, educational status, waiting time, consultation duration, being an in-patient, having a diagnosis of psychosis, contact with services for more than 6 years, marital status, sex of relatives, perceived empathy, perceived technical competency, non-verbal communication and patient [16, 1927].

There are limited studies about patient satisfaction and associated factors in the study area, so, the aim of this study is to determine the patient satisfaction level and associated factors among outpatients receiving mental health service in public health services of Mekelle town, northern Ethiopia.

Methods

Study design and area

Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted from September to August 2014. Tigray regional state has 1 referral hospital, 16 general hospitals, 218 health centers and 668 health posts. Mekelle Town is a capital city of Tigray region, located in 783 km north of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Mekelle Town has two public hospitals; Ayder referral hospital and Mekelle hospital.

Study population

The sample size was determined using the formula for a single population proportion based on the assumptions 95% confidence level, 5% degree of precision and 57% the proportion of patient satisfaction [19] Taking this assumption ‘n’ became 374 and 10% non-response rate; the final sample size was 415. Systematic random sampling was used to reach the study unit using the sampling frame of patients attending each hospital psychiatric out patient department from patient registration book.

Data collection tools and procedures

Data were collected using standardized, structured and pre-tested questionnaire through face to face interview from April 13 to May 13, 2014. The questionnaire was first prepared in English then translated to local language (Tigrigna) and back-translated into English to maintain the consistency of the questionnaire by local language translator expertise. The questionnaire address socio-demographic characteristics of the patient and client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8) and community interest company questionnaire (CIC) which assess specific providers and service characteristics, which affects satisfaction.

Global satisfaction rate was examined with the client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8), having four responses ranging from poor [1] to very good [4]. Further, specific reasons for satisfaction or dissatisfaction were studied using the modified community interest company (CIC) questionnaire again having four responses ranging from poor [1] to very good [4].

Trained supervisors and data collectors participated in the data collection process from the study area who knows the culture and language of the society. All of the data, collectors were BSc holder in psychiatry and have experience of data collection in mental health survey. Two days of intensive training was given to the data collectors and supervisors on how to conduct the data collection. A brief introduction to data collectors, supervisors and participants had been given before and during the collection process.

Data analysis

Each completed questionnaire was entered into Epi Info3.5.3 statistical software and then exported into SPSS version 20.0 packages for analysis. Frequencies, proportions and cross-tabulations were used to summarize descriptive statistics of the data. All variables which were p < 0.25 at bivariate analysis were entered into multiple Logistic regression. In multiple Logistic regression to develop the final model, OR was estimated at 95% CI to show the strength of association and p-value < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review board of school of public health, University of Gondar. Official permission was secured after communication with Mekelle city administrators through a formal letter. Respondents were informed about the purpose of the study, and written consent was obtained from the study participants so as to maintain confidentiality by omitting their names on the questionnaire and on further dissemination of study result. For those participants who were under the age of consent, assent was taken from their attendants and/or themselves when they were independent minor.

Results

A total of 415 respondents participated in the study, giving a response rate of 100%. Out of the 415 study participants, 262 (63.1%) were males and 128 (30.8%) were in the age range of 30–39. The mean age of the respondents was 35 (± 12) years. Of the total participants, 278 (67%) were Orthodox, 285 (68.7%) were Tigrian in ethnicity, and 213 (51.3%) were married. Among all study participants, 129 (31.1%) were merchants, 308 (74.2%) were urban residents, 355 (85.5%) had income in the range of ≥ 750 (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of patients attending in Mekelle public hospitals, in psychiatry department, Tigray regional state, Ethiopia, August 2014 (n = 415)

Characteristics

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Sex

Male

262

63.1

Female

153

36.9

Age (years)

< 20

10

2.4

20–29

116

28

30–39

128

30.8

40–49

94

22.7

≥ 50

67

16.1

Place of residence

Urban

308

74.2

Rural

107

25.8

Educational status

Informal education

54

13

Primary education

73

17.6

Secondary education

93

22.4

Higher education

195

47

Religion

Orthodox

278

67

Muslim

73

17.6

Protestant

24

5.8

Others

40

9.6

Marital status

Single

93

22.4

Married

213

51.3

Others

109

26.2

Ethnicity

Tigre

285

68.7

Amhara

31

7.5

Others

99

23.9

Occupation

Government employee

55

13.3

Private employee

95

22.9

House wife

40

9.6

Merchant

129

31.1

Others

96

23.1

Income

< 750

60

14.5

≥ 750

355

85.5

Regarding the diagnosis of the respondents, 170 (40.96%) had a psychotic disorder, 127 (30.6%) had mood disorder, 79 (19.04%) had nonpsychosis and 39 (9.4%) had addiction. Only 209 (50.4%) of the respondents had additional general medical condition and 229 (55.2%) had a history of admission at these public hospitals.

Regarding the respondents’ satisfaction, about one-third, (28%) of patients scored in the CSQ-8 “low” satisfaction category (below score 21), whereas 70.8% were satisfied (total score 21–27) and 1.2% very satisfied (total score 27–32). For CSQ-8 items, highest satisfaction rates were quality of service received 315 (75.9%) followed by satisfaction in an overall, general sense, with the service they received 300 (72.3%) and recommending friends if they are in need of similar services 299 (72%). While lowest rates were obtained with a comeback to the hospital to utilize the service (70.8%) and with the amount help they received (70.1%). This study showed that the global satisfaction that is measured by client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8) was 72% to the psychiatric service delivered at the outpatient departments of Mekelle public hospitals, which is the sum of satisfied and very satisfied i.e. the total score between 21–26 and 27–32 respectively.

For CIC items, highest rates were found to their relationship with healthcare staff members (75.7%) and satisfaction with confidentiality and discretion (75.2%) while the lowest rates were observed with the time they waited before their first appointment (50.2%). One hundred fifty-five (37.5%) of the respondents scored in the CIC questionnaire indicated dissatisfied, and the rest 258 (62.5%) were satisfied and very satisfied (Table 2).
Table 2

Ranked satisfaction rates for the items of Larson’s CSQ-8 satisfaction questionnaire and the modified CIC satisfaction questionnaire of respondents in Mekelle public hospitals, psychiatry department, Tigray regional state, Ethiopia, August 2014 (n = 415)

CSQ-8 questionnaire

Satisfied % (very good/good)

Not satisfied % (poor/fair)

How do you rate the quality of service you received

75.9

24.1

Did you get the kind of service you wanted

70.6

29.4

To what extent of our health services met your needs

70.8

29.2

If a friend were in need of similar help, would you recommend our service to him or her?

72

28

How satisfied are you with the amount of help you have received?

70.1

29.9

Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?

70.8

29.2

In an overall, general sense, how satisfied are you with the service you have received?

72.3

27.7

If you were to seek help again, would you come back to our hospital?

70.8

29.2

CIC-questionnaire

 Are you satisfied with confidentiality and discretion?

74.7

25.3

 Are you satisfied with your relationship with healthcare staff members?

75.7

24.3

 Are you satisfied with staff members’ availability?

69.6

30.4

 Are you satisfied with the opening hours of this treatment center?

72.3

27.7

 Are you satisfied with the length of appointment?

64

36

 Are you satisfied with frequency of appointment?

70.6

29.4

 Are you satisfied with the information received about your treatment (medication)?

75.2

24.8

 Are you satisfied with the time you waited before your first appointment?

50.2

49.6

 Are you satisfied with the information received about your health status?

73

27

During the multivariate analysis of psychiatric outpatient service satisfaction in relation to all explanatory variables, educational status, waiting time, type diagnosis were found to be significantly associated.

Those higher educational (diploma and above) were 0.34 times less likely satisfied than the rest educational group (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24, 0.97). Those complainers of long waiting time were 0.01 times less likely satisfied than those waiting for short time (AOR = 0.01; 95% CI 0.002, 0.07) and those from psychosis outpatient were 2.36 times more likely satisfied than respondents from other outpatients (AOR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.41, 5.72) as shown in (Table 3).
Table 3

Association of socio-demographic factors with patient satisfaction among patients getting services in Mekelle public hospitals, Tigray regional state, Ethiopia, August 2014

Characteristics

Level of satisfaction

COR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

Satisfied (%)

Not satisfied (%)

Sex

 Male

186 (70.9%)

76 (29.1%)

1

 

 Female

113 (73.8%)

40 (26.2%)

1.154 (0.737, 1.808)

1.116 (0.70, 1.77)

Age

 18–35

155 (73.8%)

55 (26.2%)

0.892 (0.547, 1.455)

1.064 (0.54, 2.06)

 36–45

51 (68%)

24 (32%)

0.754 (0.425, 1.339)

1.159 (0.61, 2.58)

 > 45

93 (71.5%)

37 (28.5%)

1

 

Marital status

 Single

73 (78.4%)

20 (21.6%)

1

 

 Married

153 (71.8%)

60 (28.2%)

0.699 (0.392, 1.245)

0.69 (0.88, 1.23)

 Widowed/divorced

73 (66.9%)

36 (33.1%)

0.565 (0.296, 1.077)

0.72 (0.29, 1.07)

Diagnosis

 Mood

92 (72.4%)

35 (27.6%)

1.168 (0.534, 2.558)

1.260 (0.56, 2.83)

 Psychosis

125 (73.5%)

45 (26.5%)

2.14 (1.57, 4.74)*

2.36 (1.41, 5.72)*

 Non psychosis

55 (69.6%)

24 (30.4%)

1.109 (0.443, 2.341)

1.080 (0.45, 2.55)

 Addiction

27 (69.2%)

12 (30.8%)

1

 

Educational status

 Non formal education

40 (74%)

14 (26%)

1

 

 Primary education

57 (79.1%)

15 (20.9%)

1.247 (0.547, 2.841)

1.164 (0.50, 2.66)

 Secondary education

68 (73.1%)

25 (26.9%)

0.952 (0.444, 2.04)

0.77 (0.35, 2.1.70)

 Higher education

134 (68.7%)

61 (32.3%)

0.41 (0.862, 0.87)*

0.34 (0.24, 0.97)*

Income

 < 750

48 (80%)

12 (20%)

1.657 (0.846, 3.247)

1.37 (0.68, 2.75)

 ≥ 750

251 (70.7%)

104 (29.3%)

1

 

Waiting time

 < 2 h

209 (74%)

73 (26%)

1

 

 > 2 h

90 (67.7%)

43 (32.3%)

0.02 (0.003, 0.09)*

0.01 (0.002, 0.07)**

* Statistically significant at (p < 0.05), ** statically significant at (p < 0.01)

Discussion

Measurement of patients’ satisfaction in psychiatric hospitals is important because patients’ satisfaction has been correlated with improved hospital administrative measures and quality of care. In addition, measurements of patients’ satisfaction allow organizations to identify areas of service delivery that should be improved.

This paper presents a study that is estimated the level of perceived outpatients’ satisfaction with mental health services at public hospitals in Mekelle Town. According to this study, the satisfaction level of outpatient mental health service utilization at public hospitals in Mekelle town was 72%. This result is lower than study reported from Geneva on patient satisfaction with psychiatric outpatient care, which is 85.1%. This may be due to the accessibility of the facility and diversity in users’ perception [1113]. On the other hand, a study conducted in Nigeria at Aminu Kano teaching hospital showed that 83% of the respondents were satisfied [14]. The difference could be due to data collection methods and study design. A study conducted in Mozambique showed that the satisfaction level of patients receiving medical care was 55%, which is lower than the finding of this study [9]. Differences may be due to the clinical practice difference across the hospitals.

A study conducted at Jimma hospital showed that the satisfaction level of out-patients users was 57.1%, which is lower than the finding of this study. This could be due to the difference in the nature of the service provided and user characteristics at the hospitals, or it might be partly due to data collection method. The other possible reason for the existing difference could due to well-established administration structure and equipped than the stated hospital on mental health services which has a contribution to the positive satisfaction level of the clients. Since the quality of health service is scaling up currently in Ethiopia, time of data collection may be the other reason.

The satisfaction level of outpatient service consumer in Mekelle public hospitals was related to the educational status of the respondents that shows as the educational level of respondents increases the satisfaction level decreases (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.24, 0.97). This result is in line with findings of a research conducted at Jimma hospital [6]. This shows that patients with relatively higher educational attainment have a greater expectation and they are more critical in analyzing service provided. These could make them less satisfied.

The length of waiting time is found to be significantly associated with the level of respondents’ satisfaction on the mental health services provided at these hospitals (AOR = 0.01, 95% CI 0.002, 0.07). It showed that longer waiting time leads to decrease satisfaction level. This may be related to the number of OPDs, number staffs and the type of service either is more detail or not. Most of the time clients are satisfied with the return home without considering the type of the service. Practically health professionals should consider this issue while they give service.

Another factor that showed significance in this study was the diagnosis of the respondents. Respondents from the psychotic outpatient department were found to be more satisfied compared to respondents from other OPDs (AOR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.41, 5.72). The reason could be due to expectations of the psychotic patients. They could know what the services and they can relate to services given, that makes them more satisfied than the others they do not know the service.

According to this study, the variables: age, sex, marital status, income did not show significant association with the level of satisfaction of the respondents on the service provided at these hospitals. But other studies show that these variables are significantly associated with patients’ satisfaction level. The reason could be due to the difference in the diagnosis of patients receiving health services at these hospitals and possible methodological differences in conducting the researches.

Using the standard tool and primary data are some of the strengths of the study. Social desirability bias might have occurred when completing the questionnaire and difficult to establish a temporal relationship between patient satisfaction and associated factors.

Conclusion

In this study, the satisfaction level of patients receiving mental health services at Mekelle public hospitals was found to be 72%, which is low and needs improvement. Those with higher education, longer waiting time, diagnosed with Psychosis were found to have a statistically significant association with satisfaction. Improvement in accessibility and availability of drugs, minimizing consultation time (< 45 min) or increasing number of OPD units are important to improve satisfaction. Accessibility and availability of drugs, waiting time, number of OPD units and number professionals should be considered to improve satisfaction.

Abbreviations

AOR: 

adjusted odds ratio

BSc: 

bachelor science

CI: 

confidence interval

CIC: 

community interest company

COR: 

crude odds ratio

CSQ: 

client satisfaction questionnaire

OPD: 

out patient department

OR: 

odds ratio

SD: 

standard deviation

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

HD originally develops the proposal. HD, SH and TB conduct the study. HD and SH develop the first draft of the manuscript. HD, SH and TB contributed towards data analysis, revision of the draft paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are glad to public Hospitals in Mekelle for their support in collecting the actual data. We would also like to thank the data collectors and study participants for their participation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The minimal anonymized data is submitted with the manuscript.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has obtained ethical approval from University of Gondar Institutional Review Board before its commencement. The aim of the study was explained and informed written consent was obtained from each study participants. Permission letter was also obtained from Tigray Regional Health Bureau, and from the hospitals.

Funding

The study was financially supported by University of Gondar.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, College of Health Science, Aksum University, P. O. Box: 298, Aksum, Ethiopia
(2)
School of Public Health, College of Health Science, Aksum University, P. O. Box: 298, Aksum, Ethiopia
(3)
Department of Human Nutrition, School of Public Health, Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia
(4)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Aksum University, Aksum, Ethiopia

References

  1. Biering P, Jensen VH. Concept of patient satisfaction in adolescence psychiatric care: a qualitative study. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2010;23(3):143–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaka B. Adult patient satisfaction with nursing care, Master’s thesis, June 2005 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  3. Andaleb S. Service quality perception and patient satisfaction study of hospitals in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jung M, Lee KH, Choi M. Perceived service quality among outpatients visiting hospitals and clinics and their willingness to re-utilize the same medical institutions. Prev Med Public Health. 2009;42(3):151–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mintzberg H. The structuring of organization: a synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Locker D, Dountt D. Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. Soc Sci Med. 1978;12:83.Google Scholar
  7. Labib PLZ, Brownell L. Factors affecting patient satisfaction with the psychiatric ward round: retrospective cross-sectional study. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33(3):295–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Asadi-Lari M, Tamburini M, Gray D. Patients’ needs, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life: towards a comprehensive model. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2004;2:22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brubakk AO. Methods for studying flow dynamics in the left ventricle and the aorta in man. 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Helsetilsyn S. Håndbok i drift av psykiatriske.Google Scholar
  11. Services Tnmohac. St. prp. Nr. 63 (1997–98): Om opptrappingsplan for psykisk helse 1999–2006; 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Bertschy G, Ferrero F. Patient satisfaction with psychiatric outpatient care in Geneva: a survey in different treatment settings, Department of psychiatry, Geneva, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  13. Thi PL, Briancon S, Empereur F, Guillemin F. Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(4):493–504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Damsa C, Lazignac C, Izycka M, Cicotti A, Hourton G, Andreoli A. A historical overview of the Genevan psychiatry. Ann Med Psychol. 2005;163:225–60.Google Scholar
  15. Iliyasu Z, Abubakar IS, Abubakar S, Lawan UM, Gajida AU. Patient satisfaction with service obtained from AMINU, KANO teaching hospital, Kano, northen Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13:371–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dagnew M, Zakus D. Community perception on OPD performance of a teaching hospital in Gondar town. Ethiop Med J. 1997;35:153–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Glisson C. The organizational context of children’s mental health services. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2002;5:233–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Afework S, Mariam DH, Demeke B. Assessment of quality of services in private clinics in Addis Ababa. Ethiop Med J. 2003;41:267–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oljira L, Gebre-Selassie S. Satisfaction with without services at Jimma hospital, South West Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2001;159(3):173–84.Google Scholar
  20. Greenwood N, Key A, Burns T, Bristow M, Sedgwick P. Satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric services: relationship to patient and treatment factors. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;174:159–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gigantesco A, Picardi A, Chiaia E, Balbi A, Morosini P. Patients and relatives’ satisfaction with psychiatric services in a large catchment area in Rome. Eur Psychiatr. 2002;17(3):139–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. WHO. Mental health and substance abuse. Addis Ababa: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
  23. Zewdie B, Tsion A, Mirkuzie W, Sudhakar M. Determinants of satisfaction with health care provider interactions at health centres in central Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Araya M. Post conflict internally displaced persons in Ethiopia, mental disorders and quality of life in relation to traumatic life events, coping strategy, social support, and living conditions, new series.Google Scholar
  25. Larson DE, Rootman I. Physician role performance and patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 1976;180:9–10.Google Scholar
  26. Mccabe R, Priebe S. The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness: a review of methods and findings. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2004;50:115–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Burns T. Community mental health teams: a guide to current practices. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement