Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and their relation to selected socio-demographic factors among children aged 18–30 months in northern Vietnam, 2017

International Journal of Mental Health Systems201913:29

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-019-0285-8

  • Received: 22 October 2018
  • Accepted: 17 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Autism spectrum disorders are increasing worldwide and in Vietnam. This study reports the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and examines their relation to selected socio-demographic factors among children aged 18 and 30 months in three northern cities/provinces in Vietnam, 2017.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted among 17,277 children aged 18 and 30 months one city (Hanoi capital) and two provinces in northern Vietnam. The multi-stage sampling technique was applied in this study. We used M-CHAT to screen children with high risk of ASD. M-CHAT positive cases were diagnosed by pediatric neurologists from National Pediatrics Hospital using DSM-IV criteria. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed.

Results

The overall prevalence of ASD among children aged 18 and 30 months in the three studied sites was 0.752% (95% CI 0.629–0.893%). The odds of having ASD were statistically significant higher among (a) children living in urban area as compared to those from rural settings (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.73–4.21); (b) boys as compared to girls (OR = 4.04, 95% CI 2.57–6.35); and (c) children of mothers who worked as farmers as compared to children of mothers who were government staff (OR = 4.72, 95% CI 2.03–10.97).

Conclusions

Our study revealed that the prevalence of ASD among children in Vietnam seems to be increasing. The significant correlates of ASD among the children were urban setting, male gender and mother’s occupation (farmer). Further and more in-depth studies on determinants of ASD are needed to provide insights into the problem.

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Prevalence
  • Socio-demographic
  • Vietnam

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) refer to a range of conditions characterized by some degree of impaired social behavior, communication and language, and a narrow range of interests and activities that are both unique to the individual and carried out repetitively [1]. ASD often impose significant emotional and economic burden on people with these disorders and their families [1, 2]. The impairments associated with ASD are present during the life-course [3] and are considered to have a substantial functional, social and financial impacts on affected individuals, their families and society.

Autism spectrum disorders prevalence appears to be increasing worldwide, with reported prevalence of about 0.5–1% [4]. In European countries, the prevalence of ASD, with an age range of birth to adulthood, varied from 0.019 to 7.2% [5]. The prevalence of ASD in the US in 2012 was 1.13% [6]. A recent systematic review reported the increasing trend in prevalence of ASD in South Asia, ranging from 0.09% in India to 1.07% in Sri Lanka [7]. ASD prevalence estimates were 0.118% in China in the last few years [8] and 2.64% in South Korea in 2011 [9].

In Vietnam, hospital statistics show that the number of cases of ASD admitted to the National Pediatrics Hospital increased more than threefold during the period 2000–2007 [10, 11] and fourfold during the period 2008–2010 [12]. A small-scale population-based study done by Giang et al. in 2012 in Thai Binh (a northern province of Vietnam) found the prevalence of ASD among children aged 18–24 months was 0.46% [13]. Another study conducted in Thai Nguyen in 2013 found that the prevalence of ASD among children aged 18–60 months was 0.52% [14]. In 2014, a screening program by Yen et al. [15] implemented among 94,186 children aged 18–60 months in three provinces/cities in the North of Vietnam found an ASD prevalence of 0.415%.

To provide information about epidemiologic aspects of ASD in Vietnam, this study investigated the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and examined their relation to selected socio-demographic factors among children aged 18–30 months in three northern cities/provinces in Vietnam in 2017.

In this study, we used M-CHAT for screening ASD among the studied children as it has been widely used in other settings [16]. M-CHAT was proven to be an accessible, low-cost option for universal toddler screening [17]. The M-CHAT has also been validated internationally and estimated to have the positive predictive value (PPV) varying from 0.57 to 0.65 in low-risk samples [1820]. M-CHAT has been translated into multiple languages [21] including Vietnamese. M-CHAT is currently being used as the main screening tool in clinical settings by physicians at the Vietnam National Pediatric Hospital with a positive predictive value (PPV) as high as 0.763 in 6583 children aged 18–24 months [13]. However, despite high PPV, sensitivity and specificity have not been clearly determined [22] and it is necessary to identify the percentage of false negatives [23]. We used DSM-IV for diagnosis of ASD because it has been previously applied in a variety of settings [7], including Vietnam [13]. In 2013, DSM-V was introduced and changed ASD diagnostic criteria, particularly eliminating diagnosis of a number of subtypes [24]. However, DSM-V was shown to be likely to decrease the number of individuals diagnosed with ASD [2527].

Methods

Design

This was a cross-sectional study of population-representative samples of children in nine study sites (urban and rural districts) located in three cities/provinces in northern Vietnam.

Research participants

Children aged 18 and 30 months in Vietnam who were living with their parents or caregivers at the time of research.

Research sites

The research was implemented in one city (Hanoi, capital of Vietnam) and two provinces (Thai Binh province in the Red River Delta Region and Hoa Binh province in the Northern Midlands and Mountainous Region). These research sites were purposively selected as they have typical characteristics of the region in which they are located in terms of socio-economic conditions, population structure and health system.

Sample size

The sample for each city/province was 5918 children. We estimated the sample size using the following formula:
$$n = z_{{\left( {1 - \alpha /2} \right)}}^{2} \frac{1 - p}{{\varepsilon^{2} p}}$$

In which, n was sample size at each study city/province; z (1−α/2) was equal to 1.96 (confidence level of 95%); ɛ was relative precision (35%); p was anticipated population proportion of children with ASD (0.46% [13]); and the estimated refusal rate of 15%. The total sample size was 17,754 children.

Sampling

Based on our experiences, we applied multistage sampling strategy. In the 1st stage, we selected a major city Hanoi and two provinces based on two socioeconomic regions in the northern Vietnam (as in the Decree No. 92/2006/ND-CP of 7 September 2006 on the establishment, approval and management of the general planning for socioeconomic development.) (as described in “Research sites” above). In the 2nd stage, we randomly selected one urban district and two rural districts in each city/province. A complete list of all children aged 18–30 months in the selected districts was compiled with the assistance of the District Health Center and Center of Population and Family Planning. In the 3rd stage, about 2000 children in each of the nine study districts were randomly selected from the lists of the children compiled in the 2nd stage.

Screening and diagnosis

Screening phase

We used the 23 item Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) to screen children with high risk of ASD. M-CHAT is a screening tool for ASD which has been being used worldwide [22]. In Vietnam, M-CHAT was shown to have sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 99.9% in screening ASD [13]. During the research design phase, we reviewed and considered different autism screening tools, including M-CHAT and M-CHAT-R/F. After the careful consideration, we chose M-CHAT as the screening tool in our study for a number of reasons. M-CHAT had been translated and validated in the Vietnamese context [13]. M-CHAT was also used in some other previous studies in Vietnam. This tool has been also commonly used to screen autism among children in clinical settings in a number of hospitals in Vietnam. Moreover, owing to financial limitations, M-CHAT was more much appropriate for our study than M-CHAT-R/F that required follow-up after screening. The screenings were conducted at the children’s homes with the children’s parents.

Diagnostic confirmation phase

All children of screen-positive group and 2% children of screen-negative group were invited to diagnostic confirmation assessment. Right after a screen-positive case was detected, the diagnosis was carried out at district health centers by eight doctors (04 pediatric neurologists and 04 psychologist) from National Hospital of Pediatrics using DSM-IV criteria. Each of screen-positive or screen-negative cases was diagnosed by two doctors (01 pediatric neurologists and 01 psychologist). These professionals have been performed the autism diagnosis and intervention among children for years at the hospital. The average length of time for the diagnosis was 35 min/case. The doctors were trained on DSM IV by the head of the Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital of Pediatrics who is pediatric psychologist. Figure 1 illustrates the process of ASD screening and diagnosis. There were 8 positive cases and 21 negative cases of loss to follow-up due to refusing to diagnose, moved to another province, the child was absent at the time of diagnosis, 03 children died. These professionals have been performed the autism diagnosis and intervention among children for years at the hospital.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Screening and diagnostic process

Study variables

The dependent variable was ASD, as initially identified by screening and subsequently diagnosed by pediatric neurologists, among the study participants. Independent variables included age and gender of the child, parents’ age, education and occupation, and the family’s economic status. Regarding parents, age was classified into three groups with (1) less than 29 years, (2) 29 to 39 years, and (3) 40 years and over. Education level was dichotomized into primary, secondary, high school, and university/college. Occupation status contained government and private sector staff, farmer, unstable job and other jobs. Family economy classified as poor when the annual household income was less than 1000 USD.

Data collection

In each city/province, 46 local health workers (either medical doctor or nurse, midwives) were recruited and trained. 12 supervisors were assigned to supervise and monitor the survey data collectors throughout the process of data collection and to confirm positive screened cases at the household level. A team of pediatric neurologists, public health specialists and child development therapists provided 1 day of training on data collection to all the field data collection staff. The data collectors conducted face-to-face interviews with the mother/father or caregivers of the child using a structured questionnaire with three vital components including the children and their parents’ socio-demographic information, and 23 items of M-CHAT. The screening data were collected during July and September 2017. As noted above, M-CHAT was used as the primary screening tool for ASD and M-CHAT-positive cases were diagnosed by pediatric neurologists from National Pediatrics Hospital using DSM-IV criteria.

Data analysis

Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. Prevalence estimates were derived and stratified by socio-demographic variables. Binary logistic regression models were used to evaluate the odds of the dependent measure according to the demographic and socio-economic measures. An alpha level of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance in all analyses. Data were analyzed using EPI Info 3.54 and Stata 14 software.

Results

97.3% of children’s parents (17,277 out of 17,754) consented to participate in the study and completed the M-CHAT interviews. Of the 17,277 screened children, 255 (100%) screen-positive cases and 340 screen-negative cases (2%) were diagnosed by using DSM-IV criteria. There were 8 positive cases and 21 negative cases of loss to follow-up due to refusing to diagnose, moved to another province, the child was absent at the time of diagnosis, 02 children died. Of these 247 positive cases getting assessed, 129 were diagnosed with ASD. Of these 319 negative cases getting assessed, 01 was diagnosed with ASD.

Table 1 presents general characteristics of the study sample. Most of the study children (73.8%) lived in rural areas. There were more boys (53.6%) than girls (46.4%). More than half (58.7%) of the children were aged 24–30 months. The majority of the children’s mothers (67.4%) were aged less than 29 years. Most of the mothers (71.6%) had secondary school education or higher. Of the mothers 25.3% worked as farmers and 32.1% had unstable employment. Among the fathers 50.1% were less than 29 years and 45.9% were 29–39 years. Most of the fathers (70.3%) had completed secondary school education or higher. 22.2% of fathers worked as farmer and 43.3%, had unstable employment. Almost all the children’s households (91%) were classified as non-poor.
Table 1

General characteristics of the study participants

 

Frequency

Percentage (%)

City/province

 Ha Noi

5501

31.8

 Thai Binh

5883

34.1

 Hoa Binh

5893

34.1

Area

 Rural

12,754

73.8

 Urban

4523

26.2

Gender

 Girl

8009

46.4

 Boy

9268

53.6

Age (months)

 18–23

7128

41.3

 24–30

10,149

58.7

Mother age

 Less than 29

11,649

67.4

 29 to 39

4061

23.5

 40 and older

1567

9.1

Mother’s education

 Primary education

4908

28.4

 Secondary education

5847

33.8

 High school

3419

19.8

 University/College

3103

18.0

Mother’s occupation

 Government staff

2816

16.3

 Private sector staff

3787

21.92

 Farmer

4378

25.34

 Unstable job

5537

32.05

 Others

759

4.39

Father’s age

 Less than 29

8647

50.1

 29 to 39

7933

45.9

 40 and older

697

4.0

Father’s education

 Primary education

5123

29.7

 Secondary education

6345

36.7

 High school

2756

16.0

 University/College

3053

17.7

Father’s occupation

 Government staff

2421

14.0

 Private sector staff

3037

17.6

 Farmer

3827

22.2

 Unstable job

7484

43.3

 Others

508

2.9

Number of children in the family

 1

6044

35.0

 2

8637

50.0

 3

2596

15.0

Economic status

 Non-poor

15,725

91.0

 Near poor/poor

1552

9.0

Total

17,277

100.0

The overall prevalence of ASD among children aged 18 and 30 months in the three cities/provinces was 0.752% (95% CI 0.629–0.893%). Table 2 presents prevalence of ASD among children aged 18 and 30 months by socio-demographic characteristics. The prevalence of ASD was significantly higher in urban (1.238%) than in rural areas (0.580%). The prevalence of ASD was significantly higher among children of mothers who worked as farmers (1.054%) than among children of mothers who were employed as government staff (0.497%). There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence of ASD by other socio-demographic variables.
Table 2

Prevalence of ASD among children aged 18 and 30 months

 

Count

Percentage (%)

Lower bound of 95% CI (%)

Upper bound of 95% CI (%)

City/province

 Ha Noi

46

0.836

0.613

1.114

 Thai Binh

41

0.697

0.501

0.944

 Hoa Binh

43

0.730

0.529

0.982

Area

 Rural

74

0.580

0.456

0.728

 Urban

56

1.238

0.937

1.605

Gender

 Girl

23

0.287

0.182

0.431

 Boy

107

1.155

0.947

1.393

Age (months)

 18–23

55

0.772

0.582

1.003

 24–30

75

0.739

0.582

0.925

Mother age

 Less than 29

81

0.695

0.553

0.864

 29 to 39

41

1.010

0.725

1.367

 40 and older

8

0.511

0.221

1.003

Mother’s education

 Primary education

32

0.652

0.461

0.921

 Secondary education

46

0.787

0.590

1.049

 High school

32

0.936

0.663

1.321

 University/College

20

0.645

0.416

0.997

Mother’s occupation

 Government staff

14

0.497

0.272

0.833

 Private sector staff

30

0.792

0.535

1.129

 Farmer

36

1.054

0.577

1.137

 Unstable job

42

0.759

0.547

1.024

 Others

8

0.822

0.456

2.066

Father’s age

 Less than 29

53

0.613

0.459

0.801

 29 to 39

72

0.908

0.711

1.142

 40 and older

5

0.717

0.233

1.666

Father’s education

 Primary education

31

0.605

0.426

0.859

 Secondary education

50

0.788

0.598

1.038

 High school

25

0.907

0.614

1.339

 University/College

24

0.786

0.527

1.170

Father’s occupation

 Government staff

13

0.537

0.286

0.916

 Private sector staff

27

0.889

0.587

1.291

 Farmer

18

0.470

0.279

0.742

 Unstable job

65

0.869

0.671

1.106

 Others

7

1.378

0.556

2.818

Number of children in the family

 1

39

0.645

0.459

0.881

 2

69

0.799

0.622

1.010

 3

22

0.847

0.532

1.280

Economic status

 Non-poor

118

0.750

0.622

0.898

 Near poor/poor

12

0.773

0.400

1.347

Total

130

0.752

0.629

0.893

Binary logistic regression analyses of correlates of ASD are presented in Table 3. The odds of having ASD were significantly higher among (a) children living in urban than in rural areas (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.73–4.21); (b) boys as compared to girls (OR = 4.04, 95% CI 2.57–6.35); and (c) children of mothers who worked as farmers as compared than in children of mothers who were employed as government staff (OR = 4.72, 95% CI 2.03–10.97).
Table 3

Binary logistic regression analyses of correlates of autism among children aged 18 and 30 months

 

Odds ratio

Lower level of 95% CI

Upper level of 95% CI

Province

 Ha Noi

1

  

 Thai Binh

0.78

0.49

1.22

 Hoa Binh

0.85

0.53

1.35

Area

 Rural

1

  

 Urban

2.70

1.73

4.21

Gender

 Girl

1

  

 Boy

4.04

2.57

6.35

Age (months)

 18–23

1

  

 24–30

1.00

0.70

1.41

Mother age

 Less than 29

1

  

 29 to 39

1.13

0.71

1.79

 40 and older

0.72

0.33

1.58

Mother’s education

 Primary education

1

  

 Secondary education

1.07

0.62

1.85

 High school

1.28

0.65

2.55

 University/College

0.75

0.31

1.79

Mother’s occupation

 Government staff

1

  

 Private sector staff

1.60

0.79

3.22

 Farmer

4.72

2.03

10.97

 Unstable job

1.50

0.72

3.12

 Others

1.84

0.71

4.79

Father’s age

 Less than 29

1

  

 29 to 39

1.24

0.79

1.95

 40 and older

0.89

0.30

2.62

Father’s education

 Primary education

1

  

 Secondary education

1.10

0.64

1.89

 High school

1.29

0.64

2.61

 University/College

1.33

0.57

3.11

Father’s occupation

 Government staff

1

  

 Private sector staff

1.73

0.83

3.60

 Farmer

0.64

0.25

1.65

 Unstable job

1.85

0.87

3.92

 Others

2.71

0.92

8.01

Number of children in the family

 1

1

  

 2

1.14

0.75

1.74

 3

1.17

0.63

2.19

Economic status

 Non-poor

1

  

 Near poor/poor

1.06

0.56

2.02

Table 4 shows the results of binary logistic regression analyses of correlates of autism among children aged 18 and 30 months with an interaction term of living area and gender of the child. After controlling for other variables in the model, boys living in rural areas had 3.13 times higher odds of having ASD than girls living in rural areas, and the difference was statistically significant (OR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.79–5.45). Boys living in urban areas had 9.46 times higher odds of having ASD than girls living in rural areas, and the difference was statistically significant (OR = 9.46, 95% CI 5.03–17.80). Children of mothers who worked as farmers had 4.71 times higher odds of having ASD than children of mothers who were government staff (OR = 4.71, 95% CI 2.03–10.94).
Table 4

Binary logistic regression analyses of correlates of autism among children aged 18 and 30 months with interaction term

 

Odds ratio

Lower level of 95% CI

Upper level of 95% CI

Province

 Ha Noi

1

  

 Thai Binh

0.78

0.49

1.22

 Hoa Binh

0.85

0.53

1.35

Gender * Area

 Girl * Rural

1

  

 Boy * Rural

3.13

1.79

5.45

 Girl * Urban

1.54

0.61

3.92

 Boy * Urban

9.46

5.03

17.80

Age (months)

 18–23

1

  

 24–30

1.00

0.70

1.42

Mother age

 Less than 29

1

  

 29 to 39

1.13

0.71

1.79

 40 and older

0.72

0.33

1.57

Mother’s education

 Primary education

1

  

 Secondary education

1.07

0.62

1.85

 High school

1.28

0.65

2.55

 University/College

0.75

0.31

1.78

Mother’s occupation

 Government staff

1

  

 Private sector staff

1.60

0.79

3.23

 Farmer

4.71

2.03

10.94

 Unstable job

1.50

0.72

3.11

 Others

1.82

0.70

4.74

Father’s age

 Less than 29

1

  

 29 to 39

1.24

0.79

1.94

 40 and older

0.89

0.30

2.61

Father’s education

 Primary education

1

  

 Secondary education

1.10

0.64

1.89

 High school

1.29

0.63

2.60

 University/College

1.34

0.58

3.13

Father’s occupation

 Government staff

1

  

 Private sector staff

1.73

0.83

3.61

 Farmer

0.64

0.25

1.66

 Unstable job

1.86

0.87

3.94

 Others

2.74

0.93

8.08

Number of children in the family

 1

1

  

 2

1.14

0.75

1.74

 3

1.17

0.63

2.19

Economic status

 Non-poor

1

  

 Near poor/poor

1.06

0.56

2.00

Discussion

Our study is one of few population-based studies of prevalence of ASD in children in Vietnam. Our findings show that the prevalence of ASD among children aged 18–30 months in northern Vietnam was 0.752% or 75.2 per 10,000 children. This is higher than figures reported by previous surveys in Vietnam (i.e. 0.46% [11] in 2007, 0.416–0.52% in 2013–2014 [1315]) suggesting that ASD prevalence among the children in Vietnam may be increasing, consistent with the global trend of ASD currently.

The prevalence of ASD among the children found in this study is quite similar to the average prevalence of ASD in the world (0.76%) [28]. The prevalence of ASD among the children in Vietnam is lower than that of high-income countries (e.g. 2.41% among children and adolescents in the USA in 2014–2016 [29], 1% in Finland and Sweden and 1.5% in Denmark in 2011 [30]) as well as in Asia (e.g. 1.8% in children in Japan in 2008 [31], and 2.6% in 7- to 12-year-old children in South Korea [9]). The prevalence of ASD among children in Vietnam found in this study is similar to the figure of 0.9% in India in 2015 [32].

Odds of ASD for boys were higher than for girls. This is consistent with previous findings from other countries [3337]. The discussion on gender also might need to be reviewed, as it is complex and is still not well investigated internationally.

While this may be so in older children it is unlikely to be a relevant consideration in children aged 18–30 months. It has also been suggested that sex chromosomal genes, and/or sex hormones, can lower the risk of ASD in girls [38].

Our study revealed that the prevalence of ASD was higher among children living in urban environments. This is concordant with findings from other studies in the world [39, 40]. Increasing degree of urbanization was associated with higher risk of ASD [41, 42]. It suggests that environment-related factors might contribute to this disparity. The exposure to hazardous air pollutants during pregnancy and early childhood may have potential association with increased risk for ASD [4345] while hazardous air pollutants usually concentrate in urban environments. Hygiene practices commonly in urban areas lowered microbial exposure in pregnancy and neonatal life that affects the risk for ASD [46].

Our study also showed higher odds of ASD among children whose mothers worked as farmers. This finding suggests a possible relationship between ASD and farming practice, especially the common use of pesticides in Vietnam. The amount of chemicals used in agriculture has kept increasing during the period 2002–2013 in Vietnam [47]. Several international studies have shown the association between elevated ASD risk and exposure to agricultural chemicals [4850]. The impact of chemicals on ASD should be further investigated in countries, such as Vietnam, where pesticide use is insufficiently well controlled.

Because autism is an uncommon childhood disorder a possible limitation of the study is that a larger sample size may be required to determine with greater confidence the prevalence of autism in very young children.

Conclusion

This study found a prevalence of ASD among very young children that is higher than reported from previous studies in Vietnam, suggesting the possibility that prevalence of ASD may be increasing in Vietnam, as has been suggested by studies in other countries. The significant correlates of ASD among the children were urban setting, male gender and mother’s occupation (farmer). There is a need to study the underlying specific risks associated with male gender, living in urban settings and having mother who worked as farmer in order to develop possible preventative strategies. Regardless of the underlying causes of ASD, there is clearly also a need to develop more effective and more widely available early screening/detection, diagnosis and interventions programs for ASD in Vietnam. This will require attention and investment in the areas of policy-making and implementation, strengthening of relevant human resource capabilities in health and social affairs agencies and in schools, and in development of service programs that are effective and equitably available in the diverse regions of Vietnam.

Abbreviations

ASD: 

autism spectrum disorders

DSM-IV: 

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders fourth edition

M-CHAT: 

The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers

PPV: 

positive predictive value

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

VMH and TTHB developed the proposal, analyzed the data, and prepared the draft manuscript. TVL and TTQC conducted and supervised the data collection process, analyzed the data and contributed to interpretation of the findings. NMT performed ASD diagnosis by using DSM-IV and helped in interpretation of the results. BNL and MDD developed the data entry template, checked the data entry periodically, and helped in interpretation of the results. VTP supported the development of proposal and the study implementation. HM contributed to interpretation of the findings and commented on the manuscript. All authors contributed to sequential drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank data collectors and the participants in this study, as well as Department of Health in Hanoi, Thai Binh and Hoa Binh for supporting us to implement this study. We also send thank to Ministry of Science and Technology for providing both technical and financial support to this survey.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available because the data for this study are part of a national large-scale project with multi phases that has not finished.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical permission for this study was obtained in Decision 319/2016/YTCC-HD3 of the Hanoi University of Public Health Ethics Committee dated 16th November 2016. As participants of the study were children aged between 18 and 30 months, written informed consent was obtained from each of the parents or caregivers to provide information about their children.

Funding

This survey was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam (Grant no. 26/16 – ĐTĐL: CN – CNN).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Economics and Finance, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
(2)
Department of Demography-Reproductive Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
(3)
Department of Biostatistics, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
(4)
Department of Psychiatry, Vietnam National Hospital of Pediatrics, Hanoi, Vietnam
(5)
Departments of Personnel and Organization, Vietnam Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
(6)
Global and Cultural Mental Health Unit, Center for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Australia

References

  1. World Health Organization. Factsheet: Autism spectrum disorders 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/autism-spectrum-disorders.
  2. Ganz ML. The lifetime distribution of the incremental societal costs of autism. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(4):343–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fombonne E. Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatr Res. 2009;65(6):591–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Tidmarsh L, Volkmar FR. Diagnosis and epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 2003;48(8):517–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Elsabbagh M, Divan G, Koh YJ, Kim YS, Kauchali S, Marcin C, et al. Global prevalence of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Autism Res. 2012;5(3):160–79.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2008 Principal Investigators, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance summaries (Washington, DC: 2002). 2012;61(3):1–19.Google Scholar
  7. Hossain MD, Ahmed HU, Jalal Uddin MM, Chowdhury WA, Iqbal MS, Kabir RI, et al. Autism Spectrum disorders (ASD) in South Asia: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):281.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sun X, Allison C, Matthews FE, Sharp SJ, Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Prevalence of autism in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Autism. 2013;4(1):7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh YJ, Fombonne E, Laska E, Lim EC, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(9):904–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanh VTB. Autism: early detection and intervention. Hanoi: Medical Publishing House; 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Minh QT, Thuy NTH. Clinical characteristics and initial treatment results for children with autism in the Department of Psychiatry at the National Hospital of Paediatrics. J Med Res. 2008;4(57):280–8.Google Scholar
  12. Ha VS, Whittaker A, Whittaker M, Rodger S. Living with autism spectrum disorder in Hanoi, Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 1982;2014(120):278–85.Google Scholar
  13. Giang NTH. Study of early detection of autism with M-CHAT23, epidemiological-clinical characteristics and early intervention with rehabilitation for autistic children. Thesis for Doctor of Medicine. Hanoi: Hanoi Medical University. 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Kien PT, Dung LTK, Dung DV, Nhung NTK, Yen PT. The initial results of the treatment for children with Autism Disorder Spectrum in Thai Nguyen province. J Pract Med. 2013;12:24–7.Google Scholar
  15. Yen NTH. Study on early intervention and inclusive education for autistic children in Vietnam at present and in the 2011–2020 period. Hanoi: Hanoi National University of Education; 2014. p. 373.Google Scholar
  16. Robins DL, Fein D, Barton ML, Green JA. The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers: an initial study investigating the early detection of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31(2):131–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gura GF, Champagne MT, Blood-Siegfried JE. Autism spectrum disorder screening in primary care. J Dev Behav Pediatr JDBP. 2011;32(1):48–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleinman JM, Robins DL, Ventola PE, Pandey J, Boorstein HC, Esser EL, et al. The modified checklist for autism in toddlers: a follow-up study investigating the early detection of autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008;38(5):827–39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Robins DL. Screening for autism spectrum disorders in primary care settings. Autism. 2008;12(5):537–56.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chlebowski C, Robins DL, Barton ML, Fein D. Large-scale use of the modified checklist for autism in low-risk toddlers. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):e1121–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Al Maskari TS, Melville CA, Willis DS. Systematic review: cultural adaptation and feasibility of screening for autism in non-English speaking countries. Int J Mental Health Syst. 2018;12:22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zwaigenbaum L, Bauman ML, Fein D, Pierce K, Buie T, Davis PA, et al. Early screening of autism spectrum disorder: recommendations for practice and research. Pediatrics. 2015;136(Suppl 1):S41–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Stenberg N, Bresnahan M, Gunnes N, Hirtz D, Hornig M, Lie KK, et al. Identifying children with autism spectrum disorder at 18 months in a general population sample. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014;28(3):255–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyall K, Croen L, Daniels J, Fallin MD, Ladd-Acosta C, Lee BK, et al. The changing epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:81–102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Worley JA, Matson JL. Comparing symptoms of autism spectrum disorders using the current DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria and the proposed DSM-V diagnostic criteria. Res Autism Spectrum Disord. 2012;6(2):965–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kulage KM, Smaldone AM, Cohn EG. How will DSM-5 affect autism diagnosis? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(8):1918–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson CE, Gillan N, Spain D, Robertson D, Roberts G, Murphy CM, et al. Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an adult autism spectrum disorder diagnostic clinic. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(11):2515–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Baxter AJ, Brugha TS, Erskine HE, Scheurer RW, Vos T, Scott JG. The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders. Psychol Med. 2015;45(3):601–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu G, Strathearn L, Liu B, Bao W. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among us children and adolescents, 2014–2016. JAMA. 2018;319(1):81–2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Atladottir HO, Gyllenberg D, Langridge A, Sandin S, Hansen SN, Leonard H, et al. The increasing prevalence of reported diagnoses of childhood psychiatric disorders: a descriptive multinational comparison. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;24(2):173–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kawamura Y, Takahashi O, Ishii T. Reevaluating the incidence of pervasive developmental disorders: impact of elevated rates of detection through implementation of an integrated system of screening in Toyota, Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;62(2):152–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Raina SK, Kashyap V, Bhardwaj AK, Kumar D, Chander V. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children (1–10 years of age)—findings of a mid-term report from Northwest India. J Postgrad Med. 2015;61(4):243–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang C, Geng H, Liu W, Zhang G. Prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal factors associated with autism: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(18):e6696.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Volkmar F, Siegel M, Woodbury-Smith M, King B, McCracken J, State M. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(2):237–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Baron-Cohen S. Sex/gender differences and autism: setting the scene for future research. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(1):11–24.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Newschaffer CJ, Croen LA, Daniels J, Giarelli E, Grether JK, Levy SE, et al. The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:235–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Manning SE, Davin CA, Barfield WD, Kotelchuck M, Clements K, Diop H, et al. Early diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders in Massachusetts birth cohorts, 2001–2005. Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):1043–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Werling DM, Geschwind DH. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26(2):146–53.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Lai DC, Tseng YC, Hou YM, Guo HR. Gender and geographic differences in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in children: analysis of data from the national disability registry of Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(3):909–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams JG, Higgins JPT, Brayne CEG. Systematic review of prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(1):8–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Lauritsen MB, Astrup A, Pedersen CB, Obel C, Schendel DE, Schieve L, et al. Urbanicity and autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(2):394–404.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Becker KG. Autism and urbanization. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(7):1156–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Kalkbrenner AE, Daniels JL, Chen JC, Poole C, Emch M, Morrissey J. Perinatal exposure to hazardous air pollutants and autism spectrum disorders at age 8. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):631–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts AL, Lyall K, Hart JE, Laden F, Just AC, Bobb JF, et al. Perinatal air pollutant exposures and autism spectrum disorder in the children of Nurses’ Health Study II participants. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(8):978–84.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Windham GC, Zhang L, Gunier R, Croen LA, Grether JK. Autism spectrum disorders in relation to distribution of hazardous air pollutants in the San Francisco bay area. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(9):1438–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Becker KG. Autism, asthma, inflammation, and the hygiene hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(4):731–40.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoi PV, Mol APJ, Oosterveer P, Brink PJVD, Huong PTM. Pesticide use in Vietnamese vegetable production: a 10-year study. Int J Agr Sustain. 2016;14(3):325–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Engel SM, Wetmur J, Chen J, Zhu C, Barr DB, Canfield RL, et al. Prenatal exposure to organophosphates, paraoxonase 1, and cognitive development in childhood. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(8):1182–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Shelton JF, Geraghty EM, Tancredi DJ, Delwiche LD, Schmidt RJ, Ritz B, et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(10):1103–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts EM, English PB, Grether JK, Windham GC, Somberg L, Wolff C. Maternal residence near agricultural pesticide applications and autism spectrum disorders among children in the California Central Valley. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(10):1482–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement