Open Access

Potential predictors of delay in initial treatment contact after the first onset of depression in Japan: a clinical sample study

  • Yoshiyo Oguchi1, 3Email author,
  • Atsuo Nakagawa1, 2, 3,
  • Mitsuhiro Sado1,
  • Dai Mitsuda1,
  • Yuko Nakagawa1,
  • Noriko Kato3,
  • Sayuri Takechi1, 3,
  • Mitsunori Hiyama3 and
  • Masaru Mimura1
International Journal of Mental Health Systems20148:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-8-50

Received: 7 October 2014

Accepted: 28 November 2014

Published: 5 December 2014

Abstract

Background

A growing body of evidence shows that reducing the duration of untreated illness (DUI) correlates with improved clinical outcome and course of depression. However, the factors involved in delaying treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression are not fully understood. This cross-sectional study aims to identify the characteristics that may predict the delay in initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression by comparing the socio-demographics and clinical characteristics between those with longer and shorter DUI in a well-characterized Japanese clinical sample.

Methods

Ninety-five patients with depression with longer (>12 months) and shorter DUI (≤12 months) at three Japanese outpatient clinics were studied. Subjects received a comprehensive evaluation, including semi-structured clinical interviews and assessment battery, and their clinical charts were reviewed.

Results

Of the total sample, the median of DUI was 4 months (interquartile range (IQR) 25th–75th percentile, 2–13). We found that 72.6% of patients seek treatment contact within the first year of depression onset. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that longer DUI in patients was associated with marital status (never married). Further, the DSM-IV melancholic features approached significance.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that most Japanese patients with depression are likely to seek treatment within 1 year of onset, and that marital status and melancholia may be potential predictors of the delay in the initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression.

Keywords

Duration of untreated illness Help-seeking Major depressive disorder Marital status

Background

Major depression is a common medical disorder associated with marked functional impairment [1, 2], and is recognized as one of the leading causes of disability in a population [3]. This has a significant impact on individuals and society, and is predicted to be the second largest contributor to the global disease burden by 2020 among high-income countries [4]. Therefore, providing effective and timely treatment is crucial for this debilitating disorder.

Relevant treatment guidelines recommend antidepressant pharmacotherapy, evidence-based psychotherapy, or a combination of the two treatments as an initial treatment option for acute depression [57]. However, published reports have shown that a large proportion of individuals with depression, delay and fail to establish initial treatment contact [810], thereby translating the individual’s current distress into more impervious and refractory conditions [1113]. In fact, there is a growing body of evidence showing that reducing the duration of untreated illness (DUI), defined as the interval between the onset of a patient’s first psychiatric episode and the beginning of the first appropriate treatment [14], correlates with improved clinical outcome and the course of various mental disorders such as schizophrenia [15], bipolar disorder [16], unipolar depression [17], panic disorder [18], generalized anxiety disorder [19], and obsessive-compulsive disorder [20]. Hence, reducing the interval between the onset of depression and the start of appropriate treatment might improve the evolution of the depression, and even prevent progression to other medical problems.

Despite the importance of the implication of the DUI, only a few studies have investigated the factors that influence treatment contact in people with major depression [21, 22]. Altamura and colleagues [21, 22] reported that in a clinical sample of recurrent depression longer DUI was associated with an earlier age of onset and was more prevalent in females. In an Australian clinical sample, older generations were more likely to report longer delays in seeking help than younger generations [23]. To date, however, we are not aware of any studies that have investigated the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics that associate with the delay in the initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression in Japan. Nevertheless, mental health service studies in Japan are of particular interest because of the unique universal health care system of Japan in which almost everyone receives insurance. Moreover, patients have direct access to psychiatrists without having to go through primary care physicians, which may facilitate prompt contact. On the other hand, stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental disorders are found to be more marked in Japan compared to western countries [24]. Furthermore, in Japanese cultural tradition, family members play a principal role in the decision to seek mental health services [25]. In this study, we aimed to identify the characteristics that associate with the delay in the initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression by assessing the DUI and comparing the socio-demographics and clinical characteristics in a well-characterized Japanese clinical sample.

Methods

Patients

We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 95 patients aged 22–64 years, undergoing outpatient depression treatment in three clinics—university hospital, general hospital, and psychiatric hospital—located in central and suburban Tokyo. The study was carried out at the depression clinic located at these three hospitals to which patients were referred for consultation and patient management by the affiliated treating psychiatrists. At their first visit, all patients provided written informed consent for being interviewed and for having the clinical information in their charts reviewed, as approved by the Ethical Committee of Keio University School of Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, and Sakuragaoka Memorial Hospital. Only those patients who had a DSM-IV diagnosis (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition) of major depressive disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) [26], were included. Exclusion criteria were past or current manic or psychotic episode, current serious and imminent suicidal intention, active substance problems, including comorbid alcohol or substance use disorders, active medical problems including major cognitive deficits, and lack of capacity to provide informed consent.

Measures

At the first visit, all patients received comprehensive semi-structured clinical interviews and assessment battery. DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with specific clinical features were assessed based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) [26]. Comorbid DSM-IV Axis-I disorders were diagnosed based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) [27]. Current severity of depression was assessed with the 17-item GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD17) [28]. Socio-demographics and clinical characteristics included age, gender, total education years, patient’s report of childhood abuse and bullying, family history of mood disorders, marital status [ever married (i.e., married, remarried or widowed)/never married (single)], and employment status (unemployed including medical leave/employed including homemaker and student) at the first antidepressant administration. All interviews and assessments were conducted by trained psychiatrists and clinical psychologists.

Duration of untreated illness

DUI is defined as the time period from the onset of a patient’s first depression episode until the first antidepressant administration (treatment point) based on the definition by Dell’Osso and Altamura [14]. During the clinical interview, the first onset of lifetime depression was assessed based on the patients’ memories of their first depressive symptoms, followed by probing reference points such as critical trigger event (e.g., losing employment) and life stage during onset (e.g., “Were you already working at that department when you had these problems for the first time?”) to obtain accurate response. Methodological studies have shown that the use of references points yields more substantially plausible responses than standard procedures [29, 30]. Next, in order to assess the time of the first antidepressant administration, patients were asked to remember their first consultation with physicians or mental health professionals regarding their depressive symptoms, and whether these symptoms were linked to significant life events. Supplementary information sources such as referral letters and prescription records were also reviewed.

Statistical analysis

To enable statistical comparisons among the DUI, we divided the duration of untreated illness into two subgroups: shorter-DUI (within 12 months) group and longer-DUI group (more than 12 months). Twelve months was chosen as a split time point based on previous studies [31, 32] where the length of the delay to seek treatment was shown to form a skewed distribution with the 1-year time point being important. Coincidently, previous DUI studies on panic disorders and general anxiety disorders [18, 19] have also used this 1-year time point to divide the DUI. Two-tailed Student’s t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests or Kruskal-Wallis analysis were used to compare continuous variables and Chi-square analyses or Fisher exact tests were used for categorical variables. We conducted multivariate analysis to assess the association of DUI with socio-demographics and clinical characteristics. For initial analysis, variables showing association with the shorter/longer-DUI (categorical measures) at p < 0.20 significance in the univariate analyses were entered into the backward elimination binary logistic regression model as independent variables. The dependent variable was the longer/shorter-DUI. Next, to examine the robustness of the categorical approach, we conducted a negative binomial regression analysis with the above-mentioned model by substituting DUI (in months, as a continuous measure) as dependent variable. For all other statistical tests, the two-sided significance level was set at 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Results

Characteristics of the patients

Table 1 represents the socio-demographics and clinical characteristics of all the patients (N = 95). The mean age was 40.7 years (SD = 9.9) and more than half the patients were male. One-third of patients had current DSM-IV MDD melancholic features and approximately 30% had comorbid anxiety disorders. The mean GRID-HAMD17 score was 22.3 (SD = 4.0) and the mean age at the onset of the first depression was 34.0 years (SD = 11.3). Less than half the patients had never married (single) and one-fifth of them lived alone at the first treatment point. More than 60% of patients were unemployed (including medical leave) at the first treatment point. Seven patients reported history of childhood abuse (7.4%) and 21 (22.1%) reported history of being victims of bullying, while 14 (14.7%) had family history of mood disorders.
Table 1

Socio-demographics and clinical characteristics of patients

Variables

Total (n = 95)

 

n

%

Gender (Male)

57

60.0

Marital status at the first treatment point

Ever married

56

58.9

Married and Remarried

55

57.9

Widowed

1

1.1

Never married (Single)

39

41.1

Living alone at the first treatment point

18

18.9

Working status at the first treatment point

Employed

24

25.3

Unemployed

54

56.8

Housewife and Student

17

17.9

Subtype of DSM-IV major depressive disorder

Melancholic features

31

32.6

Non-melancholic features (Postpartum, Atypical, no-subtype)

64

67.4

Psychiatric comorbidities

Any Anxiety Disorders

27

28.4

Panic Disorder (including Agoraphobia)

13

13.7

Social Anxiety Dsiorder

10

10.5

Obsessive Conpulsive Disorder

5

5.3

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

1

1.1

Eating disorder

2

2.1

Patient’s-report of childhood abuse

7

7.4

Reported victims of childhood bullying

21

22.1

Family history of mood disorders

14

14.7

 

Mean

SD

Age (years)

40.7

9.9

Total education (years)

15.4

1.6

Age onset of the first depression (years)

34.0

11.3

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Total)

22.3

4.0

 

Median [IQR 25th 75th percentile]

DUI; Duration of untreated illness (months)

4.0 [2.0 13.0]

IQR: inquartile range.

Distribution of duration of untreated illness

The distribution of DUI formed a distinctly skewed J-shaped distribution (see Figure 1). Approximately 70% of patients sought treatment within the first year of depression onset and nearly 90%, by the second year. The median of DUI was 4 months (interquartile range (IQR) 25th–75th percentile, 2–13). Of patients who sought treatment within the first year of symptom onset (i.e., DUI ≤ 12 months), 55.1% (n = 38) received the first treatment within 2 months of onset. The median DUI of the shorter DUI group was 2 months (IQR, 1–4), which was significantly different from the 20.5 months median DUI (IQR, 15–44) of the longer DUI group.
Figure 1

Distribution of the duration of untreated illness. (a) The graph illustrates the distribution of the DUI of the total sample (n = 95) stratified by 12 months. (b) The graph illustrates the distribution of the DUI among patients (n = 69) who sought treatment within the first year of symptom onset (i.e. DUI ≤ 12 months) stratified by 2 months.

When we compared DUI between the study sites, no differences were found (university hospital: 3.5 months (IQR, 2–6.8); general hospital: 6 months (IQR, 1–21.8); psychiatric hospital: 4 months (IQR, 2–13); χ2 = 0.56, df = 2, p = 0.76). Similarly, the depression severity as measured by GRID-HAMD17 were also comparable between the sites (χ2 = 5.08, df = 2, p = 0.08).

Comparison of patients with longer versus shorter duration of untreated illness

Comparison of the socio-demographics and clinical characteristics between patients with longer DUI (n = 26) and shorter DUI (n = 69) is shown in Table 2. The longer DUI in patients was associated with their marital status (never married) (p = 0.01) and living status (living alone) (p = 0.02). Greater proportion of patients with longer DUI showed melancholic depression than those with shorter DUI, although not significant (n = 12 (46.2%) vs. n = 19 (27.5%); χ2 = 2.98, df = 1, p = 0.08). Moreover, there were no significant associations between current severity of depression and age, gender, education years, employment status, patient’s report of childhood abuse and bullying, family history of mood disorders, age at onset of the first depression, subtype of major depression, and psychiatric comorbidities.
Table 2

Comparison of socio-demographics and clinical characteristics between patients with a longer/shorter duration of untreated illness

Variables

A longer DUI (>12 months) group (n = 26)

A shorter DUI ( 12 months) group (n = 69)

Analysis

 

n

%

n

%

χ2

df

p

Gender (Male)

16

61.5

41

59.4

0.04

1

0.85

Marital status at the first treatment point

Never married (Single)

16

61.5

23

33.3

6.21

1

0.01

Living alone at the first treatment point

9

34.6

9

13.0

5.72

1

0.02

Working status at the first treatment point

Unemployed

16

61.5

38

55.1

0.32

1

0.57

Subtype of depression

DSM-IV melancholic features

12

46.2

19

27.5

2.98

1

0.08

Psychiatric comorbidities

Any Anxiety Disorders

8

30.8

19

27.5

1.00

1

0.76

Eating disorder

1

3.8

1

1.4

0.53

1

0.48

Patient’s-report of childhood abuse

1

3.8

6

8.7

0.65

1

0.67

Reported victims of childhood bullying

6

23.1

15

21.7

0.02

1

0.89

Family history of mood disorders

4

15.4

10

14.5

0.01

1

1.00

 

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

t

df

p

Age (years)

40.7

9.9

41.4

10.0

-0.31

93

0.76

Total education (years)

15.4

1.6

15.1

2.1

0.65

93

0.52

Age onset of the first depression (years)

34.0

11.3

36.8

10.7

-1.1

93

0.27

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Total)

22.2

3.9

22.3

4.0

-0.12

93

0.90

 

Median [IQR 25th 75th percentile]

Median [IQR 25th 75th percentile]

  

p*

DUI; Duration of untreated illness (months)

20.5 [15.0 44.0]

2.0 [1.0 4.0]

  

<0.001

IQR: inquartile range.

*Mann- Whitney’s U-test.

It is noteworthy that the patients who never married were more likely to live alone at the first treatment point (lived alone vs. cohabited: n = 17 (43.6%) vs. n = 22 (56.4%); χ2 = 26.1, df = 1, p < 0.001). A more careful examination of the data among the patients who never married revealed that the DUI between those who lived alone and cohabited was not significantly different (lived alone vs. cohabited: n = 17; 13 months (IQR, 1.5–24.0) vs. n = 22; 6.5 months (IQR, 2.8–15.5); U = 184.5, p = 0.943). Similarly, when we compared the DUI between those who lived alone and cohabited among the total sample, no group difference was found (p = 0.33).

Multivariate analysis

First, we tested a binary logistic regression model with longer/shorter DUI as the dependent variable. The independent variables were variables associated with longer/shorter DUI in univariate tests: marital status (never married), living status (living alone), and the DSM-IV melancholic features. In the final model, only marital status revealed independent association with longer DUI as compared to other variables (Table 3). This model suggests that patients with depression who are also single have an approximately 3-fold increase in odds of delaying prompt initial treatment contact (Odds ratio 3.30, 95% CI 1.27–8.58, p = 0.01). Next, to examine the robustness of the categorical approach, we conducted a negative binomial regression analysis using the same model by substituting DUI (in months, as continuous measure) as dependent variable. Marital status (never married) (χ2 = 8.22, p = 0.004) and the DSM-IV melancholic features (χ2 = 3.90, p = 0.048) were associated with DUI (months) (Table 4).
Table 3

Multiple logistic regression model for delays to treatment contact (n = 95)

Variables

B (S.E.)

Wald

Odds ratio

95% CI

p

Never married (Single) at the first treatment point

1.19

6.01

3.30

1.27-8.58

0.01

Subtype of depression (DSM-IV melancholic features)

-0.86

2.99

0.42

0.16-1.12

0.08

S.E.: standard error; CI: confidence interval.

Table 4

Negative binomial regression model for delays to treatment contact (n = 95)

Variables

B

S.E.

Wald

Wald χ2

p

Never married (Single) at the first treatment point

0.88

0.31

0.28

8.22

0.004

Living alone at the first treatment point

-0.54

0.38

-1.29

1.97

0.1608

Subtype of depression (DSM-IV melancholic features)

-0.53

0.27

-1.06

3.90

0.048

S.E.: standard error; CI: confidence interval.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the socio-demographics and clinical variables that may predict delays in initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression in Japan. There are two major findings in this study. First, the majority of patients sought treatment contact within a year of depression onset. Second, patients who failed to undergo initial treatment within a year after depression onset were more likely to be single and living alone. In our primary regression analysis, however, a marital status of “never married” showed relatively strong association with the delay in initial treatment after depression onset. This finding coincides with previous studies that suggest that marriage has a protective effect on mental health [33, 34]. Further, the DSM-IV melancholic features approached significance in the exploratory regression analysis.

Patients with depression who had never married showed a 3-fold increase in odds of delayed initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression in our sample. Several previous studies have shown the important link between marriage and treatment seeking. In a study on 121 consecutive Japanese patients who consulted a psychiatric hospital, Asai et al. [35] reported that the family members, particularly spouses, play a crucial role as motivators who decide to seek mental health care. Mohammadi et al. [36] conducted in-depth interviews of 10 Iraqi individuals to explore the process of mental health based on grounded theory, and generated a substantive theory that individuals with mental health problems deal with their stress through help-seeking, and that marriage and problem-solving skills are prominent factor within this process. Accordingly, community studies show that individuals with a higher level of social ties, which includes marriage, are more likely to use health care services [37]. Altogether these studies suggest that the increasing evidence showing shorter DUI to have a positive effect on depression treatment outcome [17] may perhaps be mediated in part by marriage, which seems to have a potential role in promoting treatment seeking.

In our multiple regression analysis, patients who had never married were associated with delayed initial treatment contact (i.e., longer DUI), but those who lived alone were not associated. In addition, no difference in the length of DUI was found between patients who lived alone and cohabited. As a possible explanation of the relatively strong association between marriage and delayed initial treatment contact, it can be hypothesized that marriage may have a higher potential in accelerating treatment contact than just cohabitation. Accordingly, in a US descriptive study, which examined the influence of sociocultural variables on patterns of help-seeking and length of delay in psychiatric patients, Asians, including Japanese, showed more persistent involvement of close family members during the treatment-seeking process, and a reluctance to accept psychiatric treatment. In contrast, Caucasians were characterized by self-initiation of help seeking and more active pursuit of treatment [38]. There is also a traditional Japanese culture view that family members, particularly spouses, of an adult with a mental disorder are held responsible for the actions of the patient, and in fact, is defined as a spouse or legal guardian in the Japanese Act on Mental Health and Welfare for Mentally Disabled (Law number: No. 123 of 1950) [39].

In the exploratory regression analysis, the DSM-IV melancholic features revealed as potential factors associated with DUI. Perhaps, this association in part may be explained by the common clinical presentation of melancholic depression, which manifests as psychomotor disturbance such as deficits in decision making and planning [40], resulting in patients delaying to seek treatment contact.

The distribution of the delay in seeking treatment after first lifetime depression onset in our study formed a J-shaped curve pattern: a distribution where the probability of initial treatment contact is the highest in the first year of symptom onset, and gradually decrease with subsequent years. This distribution pattern of delay in seeking initial treatment for depression is consistent with the epidemiological studies conducted across nations [31, 41, 42]. The median DUI was 4 months in our sample. This finding was similar to previous Japanese studies [43, 44] and reports from Italy [45] and Portugal [46], which have a similar mental health care system where patients can seek specialist care directly without previously consulting general physicians.

There are several limitations in our study. First, causality cannot be inferred from statistical associations given the cross-sectional design. Second, our sample was limited to patients treated only at the three clinical settings in Tokyo, which may cause a selection bias and hence, generalization should be made with caution. Third, although a semi-structured interview was conducted to obtain accurate responses, the exact time of onset of the first depression may not be precise since it was assessed from patient reports. Fourth, although the threshold for DUI was 12 months based on previous studies, it is arbitrary. Fifth, there is a possibility that several factors could be confounding the results, such as personality, economic status, and geographical area.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that most Japanese patients with depression are likely to seek treatment within 1 year of delay, and that marriage and melancholia appear to be potential predictors of the delays in the initial treatment contact after the first onset of lifetime depression. This implies that to increase prompt initial treatment contacts among people with incident episodes of major depression, it is important to not only promote screening programs using brief self-reports to detect early-onset depression [47, 48], but also improve public awareness and recognition of depression, particularly focusing on close family members. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to further understand the complex relationships between socio-demographics and clinical characteristics of depression.

Abbreviations

DUI: 

Duration of untreated illness

IQR: 

Interquartile range

DSM-IV: 

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition

SCID: 

Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV

MDD: 

Major depressive disorder

M.I.N.I: 

Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview

GRID-HAMD: 

GRID-Hamilton depression rating scale.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by a Health Labor Sciences Research Grant (H22-Seishin-Ippan-005, H25-Seishin-Ippan-002) and Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP (24-4). The funding agencies had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish. We thank Dr. Takayuki Abe at the Keio University School of Medicine for helpful comments on revising the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine,35 Shinanomachi
(2)
Center for Clinical Research, Keio University School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization, Tokyo Medical Center

References

  1. Thomas CM, Morris S: Cost of depression among adults in England in 2000. Br J Psychiatry. 2003, 183: 514-519. 10.1192/bjp.183.6.514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Greenberg PE, Kessler RC, Birnbaum HG, Leong SA, Lowe SW, Berglund PA, Corey-Lisle PK: The economic burden of depression in the United States: how did it change between 1990 and 2000?. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003, 64 (12): 1465-1475. 10.4088/JCP.v64n1211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B: Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet. 2007, 370 (9590): 851-858. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Murray CJ, Lopez AD: Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997, 349 (9064): 1498-1504. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association: Practice Guideline the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. 2010, Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association (APA), 3Google Scholar
  6. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health: Depression in Adults (The Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults NICE Clinical Guideline 90). 2009, London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)Google Scholar
  7. Ogasawara K, Ozaki N: Review of the new treatment guideline for major depressive disorder by the Japanese Society of Mood Disorders. Brain Nerve. 2012, 64 (10): 1159-1165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrews G, Henderson S, Hall W: Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2001, 178: 145-153. 10.1192/bjp.178.2.145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Anthony JC, Graaf RDE, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, Girolamo GDE, Gluzman S, Gureje O, Haro JM, Kawakami N, Karam A, Levinson D, Medina Mora ME, Oakley Browne MA, Posada-Villa J, Stein DJ, Adley Tsang CH, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Heeringa S, Pennell BE, Berglund P, Gruber MJ, Petukhova M, Chatterji S, Ustün TB: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psych. 2007, 6 (3): 168-176.Google Scholar
  10. Mojtabai R: Unmet need for treatment of major depression in the United States. Psychiatr Serv. 2009, 60 (3): 297-305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Merry SN: Prevention and early intervention for depression in young people–a practical possibility?. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007, 20 (4): 325-329. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3281bc0d19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. de Graaf R, ten Have M, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S: First-incidence of DSM-IV mood, anxiety and substance use disorders and its determinants: results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2. J Affect Disord. 2013, 149 (1–3): 100-107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, de Girolamo G, Morosini P, Polidori G, Kikkawa T, Kawakami N, Ono Y, Takeshima T, Uda H, Karam EG, Fayyad JA, Karam AN, Mneimneh ZN, Medina-Mora ME, Borges G, Lara C, de Graaf R, Ormel J, Gureje O, Shen Y, Huang Y, Zhang M, Alonso J: Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Jama. 2004, 291 (21): 2581-2590.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dell’osso B, Altamura AC: Duration of untreated psychosis and duration of untreated illness: new vistas. CNS Spectr. 2010, 15 (4): 238-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, Drake R, Jones P, Croudace T: Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 62 (9): 975-983. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg JF, Ernst CL: Features associated with the delayed initiation of mood stabilizers at illness onset in bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002, 63 (11): 985-991. 10.4088/JCP.v63n1105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghio L, Gotelli S, Marcenaro M, Amore M, Natta W: Duration of untreated illness and outcomes in unipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014, 152–154: 45-51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Altamura AC, Santini A, Salvadori D, Mundo E: Duration of untreated illness in panic disorder: a poor outcome risk factor?. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2005, 1 (4): 345-347.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Altamura AC, Dell’ Osso B, Fumagalli S, Ceralli A, Mundo E: Is duration of untreated illness a poor outcome factor in Generalized Anxiety Disorder?. Intl J Neuropsychopharmachol. 2006, 9: 119-Google Scholar
  20. Dell’Osso B, Buoli M, Hollander E, Altamura AC: Duration of untreated illness as a predictor of treatment response and remission in obsessive-compulsive disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010, 11 (1): 59-65. 10.3109/15622970903418544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Altamura AC, Dell’Osso B, Mundo E, Dell’Osso L: Duration of untreated illness in major depressive disorder: a naturalistic study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007, 61 (10): 1697-1700. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01450.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Altamura AC, Dell’osso B, Vismara S, Mundo E: May duration of untreated illness influence the long-term course of major depressive disorder?. Eur Psychiatry. 2008, 23 (2): 92-96. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.11.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson A, Issakidis C, Hunt C: Delay to seek treatment for anxiety and mood disorders in an australian clinical sample. Behaviour Change. 2008, 25 (2): 71-84. 10.1375/bech.25.2.71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths KM, Nakane Y, Christensen H, Yoshioka K, Jorm AF, Nakane H: Stigma in response to mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan. BMC Psychiatry. 2006, 6: 21-10.1186/1471-244X-6-21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ito H, Sederer LI: Mental health services reform in Japan. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1999, 7 (4): 208-215. 10.3109/hrp.7.4.208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Michael BS, Robert L, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version. 2002Google Scholar
  27. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998, 59 (Suppl 20): 22-33. quiz 34-57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams JB, Kobak KA, Bech P, Engelhardt N, Evans K, Lipsitz J, Olin J, Pearson J, Kalali A: The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008, 23 (3): 120-129. 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f948f5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Means B, Loftus EF: When personal history repeats itself: Decomposing memories for recurring events. Appl Cognit Psychol. 1991, 5: 297-318. 10.1002/acp.2350050402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Knauper B, Cannell CF, Schwartz N: Improving the accuracy of major depression age of onset reports in the US National Comorbidity Survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1999, 8: 39-48. 10.1002/mpr.55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kessler RC, Olfson M, Berglund PA: Patterns and predictors of treatment contact after first onset of psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 1998, 155 (1): 62-69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Christiana JM, Gilman SE, Guardino M, Mickelson K, Morselli PL, Olfson M, Kessler RC: Duration between onset and time of obtaining initial treatment among people with anxiety and mood disorders: an international survey of members of mental health patient advocate groups. Psychol Med. 2000, 30 (3): 693-703. 10.1017/S0033291799002093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibb SJ, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ: Relationship duration and mental health outcomes: findings from a 30-year longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2011, 198 (1): 24-30. 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083550.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Brown SL: The effect of union type on psychological well-being: depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. J Health Soc Behav. 2000, 41 (3): 241-255. 10.2307/2676319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Asai K: Pathways of help-seeking of psychiatric patients in Japan: a research study in Togane City. Am J Soc Psychiatr. 1984, 4 (2): 18-24.Google Scholar
  36. Mohammadi F, Eftekhari MB, Dejman M, Forouzan AS, Mirabzadeh A: Seeking comfort: women mental health process in I. R. Iran: a grounded theory study. Int J Prev Med. 2014, 5 (2): 217-223.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Berkman LF, Syme SL: Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol. 1979, 109 (2): 186-204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin KM, Inui TS, Kleinman AM, Womack WM: Sociocultural determinants of the help-seeking behavior of patients with mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1982, 170 (2): 78-85. 10.1097/00005053-198202000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. The Mental Health and Welfare Research Organization: The Mental Health and Welfare Law a Detailed Explanation. 2008, Tokyo: Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  40. Austin MP, Mitchell P, Wilhelm K, Parker G, Hickie I, Brodaty H, Chan J, Eyers K, Milic M, Hadzi-Pavlovic D: Cognitive function in depression: a distinct pattern of frontal impairment in melancholia. Psychol Med. 1999, 29: 73-85. 10.1017/S0033291798007788.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Olfson M, Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Lin E: Psychiatric disorder onset and first treatment contact in the United States and Ontario. Am J Psychiatry. 1998, 155 (10): 1415-1422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Green AC, Hunt C, Stain HJ: The delay between symptom onset and seeking professional treatment for anxiety and depressive disorders in a rural Australian sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012, 47 (9): 1475-1487. 10.1007/s00127-011-0453-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Furukawa TA, Kitamura T, Takahashi K: Time to recovery of an inception cohort with hitherto untreated unipolar major depressive episodes. Br J Psychiatry. 2000, 177: 331-335. 10.1192/bjp.177.4.331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Okuda A, Suzuki T, Kishi T, Yamanouchi Y, Umeda K, Haitoh H, Hashimoto S, Ozaki N, Iwata N: Duration of untreated illness and antidepressant fluvoxamine response in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010, 64 (3): 268-273. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02091.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Amaddeo F, Zambello F, Tansella M, Thornicroft G: Accessibility and pathways to psychiatric care in a community-based mental health system. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001, 36 (10): 500-507. 10.1007/s001270170015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gater R, de Almeida e Sousa B, Barrientos G, Caraveo J, Chandrashekar CR, Dhadphale M, Goldberg D, al Kathiri AH, Mubbashar M, Silhan K, Thong D, Torres-Gonzales F, Sartorius N: The pathways to psychiatric care: a cross-cultural study. Psychol Med. 1991, 21 (3): 761-774. 10.1017/S003329170002239X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. The Japan International Center for Occupational Safety and Health: Guidelines for Promoting Mental Health Care in Enterprises. 2000, [http://www.jniosh.go.jp/icpro/jicosh-old/english/guideline/mentalhealth.html]Google Scholar
  48. Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Measures for Securing Safety and Health of Workers. [http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw5/dl/23010404e.pdf]

Copyright

© Oguchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement