Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the impact of Interventions A and B on mental health system performance from 1st April 2021

From: Can computer simulation support strategic service planning? Modelling a large integrated mental health system on recovery from COVID-19

Service node

Measure change in

Intervention A

Intervention B

Waiting list (%)

Service occupancy (%)

Renege from (%)

Renege to (%)

Waiting list (%)

Service occupancy (%)

Renege from (%)

Renege to (%)

L2 GP High intensity

Max

− 5

6

− 4

0

 

Mean

− 7

1

− 5

0

L2 GP Low intensity

Max

0

8

20

0

1

0

 

Mean

0

1

3

0

0

− 10

L3 IAPT Assessment

Max

0

0

− 2

0

0

0

 

Mean

0

0

0

0

0

0

L3 IAPT Social prescribing

Max

0

0

− 4

0

0

14

− 

 

Mean

0

0

− 2

− 1

0

5

L3 IAPT Therapy

Max

69

2

9

19

2

20

 

Mean

44

3

17

17

2

− 5

L4 MHP general

Max

205

16

194

4

100

 

Mean

109

16

43

3

2

L4 MHP specialist

Max

29

2

− 43

− 20

− 1

− 50

 

Mean

37

2

0

− 34

− 4

− 14

L4 MHP Crisis

Max

136

18

0

81

18

0

 

Mean

11

7

0

20

9

0

L4 MHP Triage

Max

215

63

160

40

 

Mean

17

8

11

4

L5 AWP Inpatients

Max

− 2

− 2

0

− 4

 

Mean

0

− 3

− 4

3

  1. Results represent the maximum and mean percentage change between baseline and intervention scenarios
  2. GP: general practice. IAPT: Improving Access to Physiological Therapy. MHP: Mental Health Provide. AWP: Avon and Wilshire Mental Health Partnership NHS trust