Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical indicators estimated, in the first year of follow-up, for prevalent patients with personality disorders treated by local DMHs, stratified for area (Lombardy, Emilia Romagna and Lazio Regions and Province of Palermo) and in the whole sample. QUADIM-MAP projects, Italy, 2015–2016

From: Assessing the quality of the care offer for people with personality disorders in Italy: the QUADIM project. A multicentre research based on the database of use of Mental Health services

  

Lombardia

(n = 16,196)

Emilia-Romagna

(n = 9,462)

Palermo

(n = 934)

Lazio

(n = 5,096)

Whole sample

(n = 31,688)

I2 ¥

 
 

Age-, gender-standardized treated prevalence rate (x 10,000)

19.5

25.3

9.0

10.4

17.6

  

ACCESSIBILITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE

      

1

Patients with at least one outpatient contact in CMHCs or DCs

92.3%

98.4%

74.2%

97.4%

94.4%

99

 

2

Median number of outpatient contacts in CMHCs (per PY)

8.0

13.0

7.0

10.0

9.5

99

 

3

Patients with at least one psychiatric visit

81.7%

83.9%

65.1%

76.5%

81.0%

99

 

4

Median number of outpatient psychiatric visits (per PY)

4.0

4.0

3.0

5.0

4.0

99

 

5

Patients with at least one standardized assessment using tests

4.3%

2.6%

2.2%

5.0%

3.8%

97

 

6

Median number of standardized assessments using tests (per PY)

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

0

 

7

Patients treated with at least one psychosocial intervention in CMHCs

52.4%

51.5%

52.6%

59.0%

53.2%

97

 

8

Median number of psychosocial interventions in CMHCs (per PY)

6.0

4.0

3.0

5.0

4.5

98

 

9

Patients treated with at least one psychoeducation session

3.1%

4.9%

6.2%

 

3.8%

97

 

10

Median number of psychoeducation sessions (per PY)

3.0

2.8

1.0

 

2.6

74

 

11

Patients treated with at least one psychotherapy session

20.7%

9.5%

19.7%

32.4%

19.2%

99

 

12

Median number of psychotherapy sessions (per PY)

6.0

5.0

3.5

8.0

5.7

98

 

13

Median number of interventions specifically addressed to patients’ family members (per PY)

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

0

 

14

Patients treated with antipsychotic agents

48.7%

56.6%

32.8%

39.2%

49.1%

99

 

15

Patients treated with Mood Stabilizers

44.1%

50.2%

37.8%

40.5%

45.1%

98

 
 

Patients treated with Lithium

3.8%

3.9%

1.8%

3.6%

3.8%

85

 
 

Patients treated with Valproic acid, Carbamazepine

16.8%

18.0%

26.3%

22.8%

18.4%

97

 

16

Patients treated with Antidepressant agents

46.1%

55.4%

32.0%

31.7%

46.1%

99

 

17

Patients with at least one admission in residential facilities

17.5%

16.8%

2.0%

10.2%

15.7%

99

 

18

Median number of days spent in residential facilities (per PY)

33.0

46.0

261.2

78.1

95.7

99

 

19

Patients with at least one admission in GHPW

14.2%

12.4%

12.2%

8.6%

12.7%

98

 

20

Median number of days spent in GHPW (per PY)

14.0

13.5

18.0

15.0

14.0

0

 

21

Admissions with a length of stay in GHPW higher than 30 days

5.8%

2.3%

5.5%

4.7%

5.0%

92

 

22

Unplanned re-admissions in GHPW within 7 days

14.1%

17.6%

16.1%

15.3%

15.0%

65

 

23

Unplanned re-admissions in GHPW within 30 days

27.3%

31.6%

35.5%

27.8%

28.5%

77

 

CONTINUITY OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE

      

24

Patients with continuous community care

68.8%

58.4%

33.2%

47.1%

61.2%

99

 

25

Patients persistent with Mood stabilizers therapy

49.6%

59.4%

56.1%

56.1%

54.0%

97

 

26

GHPW discharges followed by any mental health outpatient contact within 14 days

54.4%

77.0%

51.6%

67.0%

60.4%

99

 

27

GHPW discharges followed by an outpatient psychiatric visit within 14 days

34.8%

41.9%

40.1%

46.3%

37.8%

93

 

28

GHPW discharges followed by home care within 14 days §

4.4%

 

1.4%

3.4%

4.1%

84

 

SAFETY OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE

      

29

Patients monitored for hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidaemia

(in patients treated with antipsychotics)

26.4%

26.4%

25.5%

20.3%

25.6%

92

 

30

Patients monitored with Lithaemia

(in patients treated with Lithium)

69.1%

57.9%

41.2%

47.8%

61.8%

91

 

31

Patients with a complete set of clinical controls

(in patients treated with Valproic acid, Carbamazepine)

53.9%

44.8%

37.0%

40.1%

47.8%

97

 

32

Patients with a complete set of clinical controls

(in patients treated with Lamotrigine)

46.4%

38.8%

30.8%

37.0%

41.5%

56

 

33

Mortality (SMR), and relative 95% CI

2.19

(1.96 to 2.45)

2.08

(1.82 to 2.37)

2.59

(1.69 to 3.84)

1.46

(1.12 to 1.87)

2.06

(1.90 to 2.23)

  
  1. DMH: department of mental health. CMHC: community mental health centres; DC: day-care centres; PY: person-year; FGAs: first generation antipsychotics; SGAs: second generation antipsychotics; GHPW: general hospital psychiatric wards; SMR: standardized mortality ratio
  2. * P-value < 0.05 for test of homogeneity among indicators’ regional estimates
  3. § Information for Emilia-Romagna Region was not available for this clinical indicator, which was calculated on the 22,226 remaining patients
  4. ψ Psychosocial interventions are intended excluding psychotherapy and psychoeducation sessions
  5. Information for Lazio Region was not available for this clinical indicator, which was calculated on the 26,592 remaining patients
  6. After a previous hospital admission in GHPW (statistical unit)
  7. ¥ Values of I2 for heterogeneity are percentages and can be classified in: Negligible (0–25); Moderate (26–50); Substantive (51–75); Considerable (76–100)