Table 5 Joanna Briggs Quality Appraisal Summary
From: Co-producing research on psychosis: a scoping review on barriers, facilitators and outcomes
Qualitative studies | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | Congruity between stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology | Congruity between research methodology and research question or objectives | Congruity between the research methodology and methods used to collect data | Congruity between the research methodology and representation & data analysis | Congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results | Statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically | Influence of researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed | Participants, and their voices, adequately represented | Ethical research according to current criteria and evidence of ethical approval by appropriate body | Conclusions drawn flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data |
Larkin et al. [31] | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes |
Morant et al. [39] | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Pitt, et al. [38] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Schneider et al. [33] | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Susanti et al. [29] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Cross-sectional studies | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
References | Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Roelandt et al. [40] | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes |
Tischler et al. [29] | No | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Unclear | Unclear |
Descriptive studies | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
References | Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described? | Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline? | Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described? | Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described? | Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? | Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described? | Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described? | Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? |
Csipke et al. [34] | Unclear | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Higgins et al., [27] | Yes | Unclear | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Kristensen et al. [26] | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Neil et al. [37] | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Pelletier et al. [35] | Unclear | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Realpe et al. [32] | Unclear | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Sin et al. [28] | Unclear | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |
Terp et al. [30] | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes |