Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of components that facilitated or hindered the implementation process according to interviews and documentation

From: Implementation of a novel return-to-work approach for persons with affective disorders in a traditional vocational rehabilitation context: a case study

Facilitating components

 Process

Planning: Meetings and dialogues about model fit involved all organizational levels

Engaging: Successful recruitment of opinion leaders

Executing: Continuous meetings with opinion leaders, distribution of newsletters, supportive feedback

 Intervention characteristics

Relative advantage: Appropriate support for the target group; people with affective disorders are in need of RTW support

Employment specialist competence of labour market and psychiatry

Person-centred, continuous and not time-limited support

 Inner setting

Networks and communication: Employment specialists built constructive relationships and functioning teams with engaged staff members in the mental healthcare units

Opinion leaders enhanced collaboration at the mental healthcare units, and this was important for the ongoing intervention

 Outer setting

Cosmopolitanism: Fruitful collaboration was developed in some PES and SIA services

Hindering components

 Process

Planning: Large geographic area and involvement of many organizations made implementation complex

Major reorganizations delayed implementation

Engaging: Difficulty engaging opinion leader in one mental healthcare unit

Lack of time and work overload for first line managers

 Intervention characteristics

Relative disadvantage: Staff members in mental healthcare units had divergent opinions about the IES model fit into their organization

Informants from the PES modestly questioned the IES model advantage

 Inner setting

Implementation climate: Difficulty for employment specialist to integrate into existing mental healthcare teams

Compatibility: Responsibility, commission, and financing of RTW support was perceived as unclear, related to vague guidelines for vocational services and organizational boundaries

 Outer setting

Cosmopolitanism: Collaboration with PES and their subcontractors was complex and time-consuming

Patient needs and resources: Differing perspectives on how to design RTW support, location of internships and vocational training were proposed by the PES according to regulations