Skip to main content

Table 3 Functional and familial burden for psychosis

From: Evaluation of outcomes for psychosis and epilepsy treatment delivered by primary health care workers in Nepal: a cohort study

 

Program (n = 48)

Control (n = 17)

ANCOVA

Full cohort T

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Effect size

F, partial eta2

P-val*

Mean

(SD)

Effect Size

Z, r

P-val**

WHODAS

0.52, 0.01

0.52

  

4.60, 0.57

< 0.0001

Baseline

46.1

(24.2)

37.4

(25.6)

  

43.8

(24.7)

  

end point

23.1

(20.8)

27.1

(30.9)

  

24.1

(23.7)

  

Δ score

− 23.0

(27.0)

− 10.3

(44.3)

  

− 19.7

(32.6)

  

BAS

    

0.29, < 0.01

0.59

  

6.81, 0.84

< 0.0001

Baseline

76.5

(8.0)

76.0

(8.2)

  

76.4

(8.0)

  

end point

63.3

(6.5)

62.1

(9.3)

  

62.9

(7.3)

  

Δ score

− 13.3

(8.6)

− 13.9

(11.5)

  

− 13.4

(9.4)

  

FIS: symptoms and social behavior

 

0.16, < 0.01

0.69

  

5.94, 0.74

< 0.0001

Baseline

46.5

(9.7)

41.2

(11.4)

  

45.1

(10.4)

  

end point

31.1

(9.4)

31.6

(11.0)

  

31.2

(9.8)

  

Δ Score

− 15.4

(12.3)

− 9.6

(15.8)

  

− 13.9

(13.4)

  

FIS: impact on caregiver

  

2.02, 0.03

0.16

  

5.13, 0.64

< 0.0001

Baseline

12.0

(5.9)

10.9

(6.3)

  

11.7

(6.0)

  

end point

5.9

(4.3)

7.6

(5.7)

  

6.3

(4.7)

  

Δ score

− 6.1

(6.4)

− 3.3

(7.9)

  

− 5.4

(6.9)

  
  1. WHODAS World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 Short Version, BAS burden assessment schedule, FIS Family Interview Schedule
  2. * P-value taken from ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) for each scale comparing program vs. control scores at end point, adjusted for baseline score
  3. ** P-value from Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test comparing baseline to end point scores (full cohort)