Skip to main content

Table 1 Cross-country stakeholder forcefield analysis map

From: Stakeholder analysis of the Programme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME): baseline findings

Power

Opposition

Not mobilised

Mostly supportive

Supportive

High

 

Parliament (IN, UG)

MH Specialists, PHC Workers, CHW (SA)

WHO, MoH (ET, NP, UG)

PHC Workers (UG)

Parliament (ET)

Volunteer Workers (IN)

DFID UK (ET, NP, UG)

Persons with mental illness, Families (ET, IN)

DFID local (ET)

Service User groups (IN)

Other donors (NP)

CBOs (ET)

MH Specialists (UG)

I-Media (SA)

N-Media (NP, UG)

R-Media (ET, SA)

State/District Media (NP)

N-Media (IN, SA)

Universities (ET)

State/District Media (ET, IN, SA)

Medium–high

   

Non-Health Ministries (ET)

MH Specialists (ET)

Service User groups (NP)

INGOs, NGOs, CBOs (NP)

FBOs (ET)

N-Media (ET)

Medium

 

Non-Health Ministries (NP, UG)

 

WHO, MoH (IN, SA)

CHW (UG)

 

Non-Health Ministries, Parliament (SA)

Persons with mental illness (UG)

 

DFID UK (IN, SA)

CBOs, FBOs (IN)

 

DFID local (IN, NP, SA)

I-Media (IN)

 

Other donors (ET, SA)

State/District Media (UG)

 

CHW (ET)

Universities (IN, SA)

 

Service User groups (UG)

  

INGOs (UG)

NGOs (IN, SA)

CBOs, FBOs (SA)

Universities (UG)

Low–medium

 

MH Specialists, PHC Workers, CHW (IN)

 

MH Specialists (NP)

  

PHC Workers (ET)

Persons with mental illness, Families (NP)

Low

 

Non-Health Ministries (IN)

FBOs (NP)

PHC in MoH (NP)

DFID local (UG)

 

PHC Workers, CHW, Volunteer Workers (NP)

Other donors (IN, UG)

 

Service User groups (ET)

Persons with mental illness, Families (SA)

 

INGOs (ET)

Families of persons with mental illness (UG)

 

I-Media (NP)

INGOs (IN)

 

Universities, Research Institutes (NP)

CBOs, FBOs (UG), Research Institutes (UG)

  
  1. Perceived power to influence the scaling up of mental health care (down) by position relating to the scale up of mental health care (across).
  2. ET Ethiopia, IN India, NP Nepal, SA South Africa, UG Uganda.