Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratios for high psychological distress among high school students, Zagreb, Croatia, 2014

From: Influence of different domains of social capital on psychological distress among Croatian high school students

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Family support in school

    

 High

0.37 (0.27-0.51) ***

  

0.43 (0.31-0.59) ***

 Low

    

Neighborhood trust

    

 High

 

0.62 (0.53-0.73) ***

 

0.69 (0.58-0.82) ***

 Low

    

Informal social control

    

 High

 

1.07 (0.89-1.28)

 

1.10 (0.91-1.32)

 Low

    

Teacher-student interpersonal trust

    

 High

  

0.74 (0.62-0.89) ***

0.80 (0.67-0.96) **

 Low

    

Student interpersonal trust

    

 High

  

0.79 (0.65-0.97) *

0.81 (0.66-1.00) *

 Low

    

Students’ collaboration in school

    

 High

  

0.82 (0.64-1.04)

0.84 (0.66-1.07)

 Low

    

Gender

    

 Female

2.53 (2.14-2.98) ***

2.40 (2.03-2.83) ***

2.42 (2.05-2.86) ***

2.38 (2.02-2.82) ***

 Male

    

Body mass index

    

 Overweight/Obese

1.24 (0.97-1.59)

1.25 (0.98-1.60)

1.28 (1.00-1.63)

1.25 (0.98-1.60)

 Normal

    

Self-perceived socioeconomic status

    

 High/Middle

1.00 (0.85-1.18)

1.02 (0.86-1.20)

1.00 (0.84-1.18)

1.01 (0.85-1.19)

 Low

    

Self-rated health

    

 Good

0.38 (0.26-0.55) ***

0.38 (0.26-0.55) ***

0.36 (0.26-0.55) ***

0.42 (0.29-0.61) ***

 Poor

    

Physical activity

    

 High/Moderate

0.37 (0.26-0.53) ***

0.39 (0.28-0.55) ***

0.40 (0.29-0.57) ***

0.44 (0.31-0.62) ***

 Low

    
  1. ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval.
  2. Model 1: Association between family social capital and psychological distress adjusted for age, school, gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, self-rated health and physical activity.
  3. Model 2: Association between neighborhood social capital and psychological distress adjusted for age, school, gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, self-rated health and physical activity.
  4. Model 3: Association between school social capital and psychological distress adjusted for age, school, gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, self-rated health and physical activity.
  5. Model 4: Association between all social capital variables and psychological distress adjusted for age, school, gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, self-rated health and physical activity.