KM archetypes | Leverage points for changing complex systems | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paradigms | Goals | Structure and rules | Relationships and power | Feedback | Elements | |
Producing and disseminating knowledge | Apply a ‘systems lens’, using methods for analysing and responding to complexity | Be clear about the goals of collaborative knowledge production for the project including whether and how they fit with the goals of the local system –engage with local leaders who are in the strongest position to make this impactful | Establish a governance structure early to ensure a collaborative process from an early stage to ensure there are no surprise expectations | Reflection on whose knowledge is being privileged through the participatory modelling process and with what impacts. Aim to ensure that deliberative processes provide opportunity for a diverse range of knowledge to be incorporated into the model development | Provide clear and accessible preliminary findings to participants and incorporate their views in final papers and reports | Develop resources to facilitate learning, capacity development and co-production at each modelling site |
Complex problems are multifaceted: embrace interdisciplinary approaches | Engage with local stakeholders to understand their policy/practice challenges before trying to produce knowledge to influence change. Make the research useful for them | Include shared ethical approaches and governance standards to data sharing and research processes through collaborative agreements | Use implementation strategies to facilitate inclusion of people from a range of backgrounds, including people with lived experience, carers, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and LGBTIQ + community | Discuss views that are at variance with model findings | Use creative strategies to communicate with and build systems thinking capacity among community partners and other stakeholders taking into consideration specific methods to engage with sub-groups for example, young people, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities | |
Reflect on what knowledge is valued and most fit-for purpose | Look for opportunities to optimise benefits for communities through the exploration of ‘multi-solving’ approaches e.g., exploring portfolios of interventions that provide maximum positive impact | Provide knowledge on timelines and methodology proposed that is contextual to the stakeholders and the community | Resolve complex problems using iterative action, reflection and deliberation, sharing ideas and experiences as well as formal knowledge: build this into the participatory process | Learn about and from the context through PAR methods | ||
Question traditional hierarchies of evidence: do not automatically privilege a particular type of evidence if it is at the expense of “ecological fit” (local relevance and applicability) | Learn early the community and governance structures of stakeholders and their agencies to ensure knowledge production is accordingly adaptive and targeted | Engage stakeholders in interpreting and strategically communicating knowledge from the research, e.g., blend community stories with epidemiological data to educate the media and other stakeholders about human costs and contextual realities | ||||
Engage with local stakeholders and use participatory methods to build in relevance, applicability and knowledge translation. Help participants’ reflect on their worldviews and frames of reference by including stakeholders with a diverse range of knowledge and experience | ||||||
Embed system science methods, e.g., systems modelling, to facilitate shared understanding of the challenges and improvement opportunities for local youth mental health systems | ||||||
Researching in practice | ‘Diagnose’ the context to facilitate the selection of appropriate implementation strategies | Consider the system’s current and historical dynamics and how they impact on the future trajectory | Be flexible in implementation that is guided by principles and ‘form” rather than strict adherence to rules | Encourage local ownership of the research | Use knowledge to inform action through existing feedback (communication) loops and by establishing new feedback loops | Utilise methods that capture the views and experiences of key stakeholders |
Recognise that knowledge evolves and must be considered in context | Engage with local stakeholders to ensure that measures and outcomes reflect their interests and priorities | Focus on adaptation, interdependencies and being responsive to emerging and changing local needs | Work with local champions to communicate ideas, get feedback and adapt implementation strategies for a contextualised “best fit” | Use and invite stories to surface tacit knowledge | Work towards “best fit” practices that optimise reach in the community | |
Recognise that this research is occurring within an existing complex system and should be empowering rather than prescriptive for local participants | Design shared goals | Foster local organisational and individual learning and development | Value local innovations that have been shown to work well for local communities | Use reflexive practices to learn, adapt and improve processes | Use learning oriented implementation | |
Be cognisant that complex problems can be shifted but are rarely solved. Systems change takes time to embed and show results | Support local capability development | |||||
Fostering networks | Intentionally form networks across disciplines and stakeholder groups | Develop a clear vision for fostering networks within each community site | Be transparent about roles, structures and processes for decision making | Identify and work closely with local ‘connectors’ to facilitate relationships | Embed an open and reflective culture to facilitate learning across networks | Look for opportunities to facilitate full participation of local stakeholders in the research collaboration |
Aim to bring together diverse perspectives and develop a shared understanding of the local youth mental health system | Ensure that membership of the network is broad and inclusive | Articulate and, where possible, address barriers to knowledge sharing | Utilise methods that foster inclusivity, giving all participants a voice (eg., providing funding for each site to support community engagement) | Continuously review and adapt communication processes, KM strategies and goals to optimise local impact | Provide platforms for sharing knowledge | |
Utilise system science methods, e.g., social network analysis, to map and analyse local networks and how they change over time | Consider where networks formed through this research can be embedded and sustained in the local system | Value the quality of relationships as highly as project delivery | Ensure that participants are kept well-informed about progress and have a say in decision making about project priorities | Embed evaluation strategies that capture the changes in social networks | ||
Use formal and informal networks and methods to communicate | Focus on building mutual trust and respect | |||||
Working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities | Recognise that the continuing process of colonisation forms the context of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s lived experience of suicide, and that this requires a distinctive response to ongoing injustices | Ensure that knowledge and other benefits generated are genuinely accepted by and shared with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities | Be open to changing structures and processes in response to the advice of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elders and community leaders | Recognise the leadership of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elders and community leaders | Be prepared to accept feedback from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, in any form and at any time | Embed the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander concept of social and emotional wellbeing in all the work [77] |
Recognise the role of intergenerational trauma in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander suicide and be prepared to accept people’s grief, loss, distress or anger | Understand the genuine, reciprocal inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in this work as an act of reconciliation | Recognise the importance of engaging according to cultural protocols | Learn how to work under Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander governance and leadership and respect the community’s own systems of authority when working with them | Make strong efforts to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders’ and communities’ participation in information sharing and iterative project development, recognising that they may have different engagement needs and preferences | Ensure all aspects of the Program conform to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical principles [78] | |
Apply Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledges and evaluation protocols wherever appropriate. In particular, acknowledge the holistic concept of social and emotional wellbeing as a foundation for preventing suicide | Support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s governance and ownership of data that relates to them; collect and share data in a form that is valuable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders in pursuing their own community objectives | Work to develop strong reciprocal relationships of trust with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders before attempting to transact business |