Whose responsibility? Part 1 of 2: A scale to assess how stakeholders apportion responsibilities for addressing the needs of persons with mental health problems

Table 7 WRS items which were never assigned a score between 7 and 10 at either Time 1 or Time 2 of testing

Stakeholders being apportioned responsibility	Need being rated	Stakeholders who did not assign scores between 7 and 10
Government vs. persons with mental health problems^a	Financial support	Patients in Chennai
	Coverage for the costs of mental health services	Patients in Chennai
Government vs. families^b	Coverage for the costs of mental health services	Clinicians, both sites combined; patients in Chennai
Family vs. persons with mental health problems^c	Provision or support for housing	Patients in Chennai
	Coverage for the costs of mental health services	Patients in Chennai
	Awareness and reduction of stigma surrounding mental health problems	Patients in Chennai; families in Chennai; clinicians at both sites

vs. versus
^a and ^cScore of 10 = patients should be more responsible for supporting the specific need
^bScore of 10 = families should be more responsible for supporting the specific need

ISSN: 1752-4458