Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of intensive home treatment and care as usual on self-efficacy dimensions during 26 weeks

From: The effects of intensive home treatment on self-efficacy in patients recovering from a psychiatric crisis

Linear mixed modelling analyses
Self-efficacy dimensions N Main effects B 95% CI SE DF t p
Lower Upper
Optimism 116 Intercept 2.09 1.58 2.61 0.26 127.12 8.02  < 0.001
   Baseline Optimism 0.54 0.44 0.65 0.05 112.82 10.08  < 0.001
   Treatment − 0.08 − 0.41 0.25 0.17 178.88 − 0.50 0.62
   Time − 0.05 − 0.33 0.24 0.14 106.09 − 0.32 0.75
   Time*Treatment − 0.08 − 0.44 0.27 0.18 106.79 − 0.46 0.65
Advocacy 116 Intercept 3.05 2.53 3.57 0.26 124.13 11.57  < 0.001
   Baseline Advocacy 0.38 0.27 0.48 0.05 105.68 7.03  < 0.001
   Treatment − 0.12 − 0.44 0.20 0.16 197.72 − 0.74 0.46
   Time 0.04 − 0.28 0.36 0.16 102.04 0.23 0.82
   Time*Treatment − 0.01 − 0.41 0.39 0.20 103.00 − 0.07 0.95
Coping 115 Intercept 2.15 1.65 2.64 0.25 128.64 8.60  < 0.001
   Baseline Coping 0.50 0.39 0.61 0.06 115.19 8.94  < 0.001
   Treatment − 0.02 − 0.35 0.32 0.17 170.10 − 0.09 0.93
   Time 0.05 − 0.23 0.33 0.14 104.35 0.33 0.74
   Time*Treatment − 0.15 − 0.50 0.20 0.18 104.65 − 0.85 0.40
Self-efficacy 115 Intercept 2.15 1.68 2.61 0.23 123.54 9.15  < 0.001
   Baseline Self-efficacy 0.53 0.43 0.63 0.05 112.67 10.30  < 0.001
   Treatment − 0.08 − 0.36 0.20 0.14 172.85 − 0.55 0.59
   Time − 0.01 − 0.24 0.22 0.12 103.95 − 0.06 0.95
   Time*Treatment − 0.08 − 0.37 0.21 0.15 104.66 − 0.57 0.57
  1. The outcome based on a per-protocol analysis, based on estimated marginal means
  2. Self-efficacy the total of all self-efficacy dimensions, N number of participants included in the analysis, B estimated regression coefficient, CI confidence interval, SE standardised error, DF degrees of freedom, t T-test value