Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of intensive home treatment and care as usual on self-efficacy dimensions during 26 weeks

From: The effects of intensive home treatment on self-efficacy in patients recovering from a psychiatric crisis

Linear mixed modelling analyses

Self-efficacy dimensions

N

Main effects

B

95% CI

SE

DF

t

p

Lower

Upper

Optimism

116

Intercept

2.09

1.58

2.61

0.26

127.12

8.02

 < 0.001

  

Baseline Optimism

0.54

0.44

0.65

0.05

112.82

10.08

 < 0.001

  

Treatment

− 0.08

− 0.41

0.25

0.17

178.88

− 0.50

0.62

  

Time

− 0.05

− 0.33

0.24

0.14

106.09

− 0.32

0.75

  

Time*Treatment

− 0.08

− 0.44

0.27

0.18

106.79

− 0.46

0.65

Advocacy

116

Intercept

3.05

2.53

3.57

0.26

124.13

11.57

 < 0.001

  

Baseline Advocacy

0.38

0.27

0.48

0.05

105.68

7.03

 < 0.001

  

Treatment

− 0.12

− 0.44

0.20

0.16

197.72

− 0.74

0.46

  

Time

0.04

− 0.28

0.36

0.16

102.04

0.23

0.82

  

Time*Treatment

− 0.01

− 0.41

0.39

0.20

103.00

− 0.07

0.95

Coping

115

Intercept

2.15

1.65

2.64

0.25

128.64

8.60

 < 0.001

  

Baseline Coping

0.50

0.39

0.61

0.06

115.19

8.94

 < 0.001

  

Treatment

− 0.02

− 0.35

0.32

0.17

170.10

− 0.09

0.93

  

Time

0.05

− 0.23

0.33

0.14

104.35

0.33

0.74

  

Time*Treatment

− 0.15

− 0.50

0.20

0.18

104.65

− 0.85

0.40

Self-efficacy

115

Intercept

2.15

1.68

2.61

0.23

123.54

9.15

 < 0.001

  

Baseline Self-efficacy

0.53

0.43

0.63

0.05

112.67

10.30

 < 0.001

  

Treatment

− 0.08

− 0.36

0.20

0.14

172.85

− 0.55

0.59

  

Time

− 0.01

− 0.24

0.22

0.12

103.95

− 0.06

0.95

  

Time*Treatment

− 0.08

− 0.37

0.21

0.15

104.66

− 0.57

0.57

  1. The outcome based on a per-protocol analysis, based on estimated marginal means
  2. Self-efficacy the total of all self-efficacy dimensions, N number of participants included in the analysis, B estimated regression coefficient, CI confidence interval, SE standardised error, DF degrees of freedom, t T-test value