Table 2 Results of the critical appraisal
From: Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
| Â | No/scant details (%) | Addressed but not fully detailed (%) | Comprehensively addressed (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | 52.6 | 26.3 | 21.1 |
Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? | 0 | 15.8 | 84.2 |
Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | 10.5 | 47.4 | 42.1 |
Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered? | 73.7 | 5.3 | 21.1 |
Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | 26.3 | 36.8 | 36.8 |
Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | 15.8 | 26.3 | 57.9 |
Is there a clear statement of findings? | 5.3 | 0 | 94.7 |
How valuable is the research? | 5.3 | 5.3 | 89.5 |