Skip to main content

Table 2 Scheme of the used mixed-methods tool

From: Knowledge evaluation in dementia care networks: a mixed-methods analysis of knowledge evaluation strategies and the success of informing family caregivers about dementia support services

Data-label

(cut-off scores)

KM area (based on Probst [8])

DCN-groups (persons/organizations)

Material-proof (+ − > formalized/− − > non formalized)

Result (+ = 1/− = 2)

1.0–1.49

Highly formalized knowledge management

1.50–2.0

Less formalized knowledge management

Knowledge aims/identification

Internal stakeholders

E.g.: mission statements (~ +) or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

 

Knowledge development/acquisition

Internal stakeholders

E.g.: journal clubs (~ +) or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

External stakeholders

E.g.: conferences (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

Knowledge distribution

Internal stakeholders

E.g.: IT-portals (~ +) or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

External stakeholders

E.g.: informative materials (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

User

E.g.: press work (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

Knowledge use

Internal stakeholders

E.g.: guidelines (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

Knowledge evaluation

Internal stakeholders

E.g.: quality circles (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

External stakeholders

E.g.: research institutes (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

User

E.g.: feedback surveys (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

+

Knowledge storage

Internal stakeholders

E.g.: IT-libraries (~ +)

or no formalization (~ −)

1 or 2

=

End-result

x/11 = 1.0–2.0