Open Access

Factors associated with choice of high lethality methods in suicide attempters: a cross-sectional study

  • Sang Hoon Oh1,
  • Kyoung Uk Lee2,
  • Soo Hyun Kim1,
  • Kyu Nam Park1,
  • Young Min Kim1 and
  • Han Joon Kim1Email author
International Journal of Mental Health Systems20148:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-8-43

Received: 12 August 2014

Accepted: 6 November 2014

Published: 18 November 2014

Abstract

Background

Most attempted suicides have a low lethality, but hanging, drowning, and jumping from a great height have a high risk of completed suicide. The aim of this study was to assess the sociodemographic profiles of patients who attempted suicide using high lethality methods relative to all other methods of attempted suicide.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated all attempted suicides treated at a tertiary university hospital in Seoul between January 2008 and February 2012. The following variables were considered: the patients’ attempted suicide methods, age, sex, history of attempted suicides, previous psychiatric history, occupation, and living conditions. The suicide methods were categorized into two groups: high lethality (e.g., hanging, falling, and drowning) and low lethality methods (e.g., self-poisoning and cutting). We investigated risk factors related to the choice of high lethality methods.

Results

A total of 560 patients were enrolled in this study. Deliberate self-poisoning was the most common method of attempted suicide (61.6%), followed by cutting (22.5%), hanging (10.4%), falling (4.1%), and drowning (1.4%). In logistic regression analyses, odds ratios for the choice of high lethality methods were 1.02 (95% CI = 1.01 to 1.03, p < .01), 7.22 (95% CI = 3.06 to 17.04, P < .01), and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.35 to 0.99, p = .04) for age, previous attempted suicide with a high lethality method, and alcohol co-ingestion, respectively.

Conclusions

Our findings indicated that age and past attempted suicide using a high lethality method are associated with the use of high lethality methods for attempting suicide.

Keywords

Attempted suicide Poisoning Methods

Background

Suicide rates vary geographically, but suicide is one of the major causes of mortality worldwide and an important public health problem [13]. In Korea, suicide is currently the most serious and urgent public health issue. Korea has the highest suicide rate among member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). In 2011, Statistics Korea reported a suicide rate of 31.7 per 100,000 people, which is 2.6 times greater than the OECD average and represents a twofold increase in suicides over the last decade [4]. Suicide is the fourth leading cause of death following cancer, stroke, and cardiovascular disease [4]. Park and Lester’s study on suicide in Korea using the 2005 suicide data reveals that suicide rates were higher in rural areas than in urban areas [5]. Those in rural areas more often used pesticides and chemicals as a method of suicide, and there was a greater proportion of men and the elderly, both groups at higher risk for suicide in Korea. And Kim et al. suggest that the current suicide epidemic in Korea has social origins such as lower education, rural residence, and area deprivation [6].

Most attempted suicides involve self-poisoning or cutting, which are typically classified as low lethality methods. On the other hand, hanging, drowning, the use of firearms or explosives, and jumping from a great height are less common but are classified as high lethality methods and have a high risk of completed suicide [7, 8]. Although the factors influencing an individual’s suicide method may include sociocultural acceptability and media portrayals of suicide [9, 10], little is known about which factors are related to an individual’s suicide method. Understanding the characteristics of attempted suicides using high lethality methods will help in designing suicide prevention strategies.

In this study, we evaluated the association between the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals who attempted suicide and their choice of suicide methods, with the aim of identifying risk factors for choosing high lethality methods.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had visited the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary university hospital for treatment following an attempted suicide between January 2008 and February 2012. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary’s Hospital.

In Korea, patient information on the cause of ED admission is immediately reported to the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) records. If the cause of admission was a deliberate self-harm, information on the method used for each attempted suicide was recorded as either poisoning, cutting or piercing, suffocation, hanging or choking, drowning or near drowning, using fire or heat, falling or jumping from a great height, other method, or unknown. All patients who had visited our ED after attempted suicides were included in the NEDIS records. Two emergency physicians independently reviewed medical records of these patients.

The variables included suicide methods, sociodemographic characteristics, and hospital discharge outcomes. Suicide methods were dichotomized into low lethality and high lethality methods. Low lethality methods are the most common methods of parasuicide and are sometimes known as soft methods. Such methods include self-poisoning and self-harm such as cutting or piercing [8]. High lethality methods are followed by more serious injuries, for example, hanging, drowning, falling, or using fire or heat. Sociodemographic variables included the number of attempted suicides, family status, occupation, alcohol use, and past psychiatric history. In addition, all medical records, including the discharge records, were reviewed to determine whether the suicide was completed (i.e., the patient died) prior to hospital discharge.

The distribution of patient characteristics is presented as either a percentage or the mean (± standard deviation). To compare the distribution of the characteristics between the two groups, we used Student’s t-test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. Sociodemographic factors related to high lethality methods were evaluated with a multivariate logistic regression analysis; odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated in the logistic regression model. In addition, compared with patients using self-poisoning, the ORs of other methods for completed suicides were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16 (SPSS, Chicago, IL), and differences with a p-value < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 621 cases of attempted suicides during the study period, which constituted 0.27% of total ED visits during this period. For 61 patients with self-cutting to the wrist, extensive records (including assessments by the psychiatrists) were incomplete. These patients without complete medical records were excluded from this study. As a result, a total of 560 patients were enrolled in this study (Figure 1). Deliberate self-poisoning was the most commonly chosen method for attempted suicide (61.6%), followed by cutting or piercing (22.5%), hanging (10.4%), falling (4.1%), and drowning (1.4%). Table 1 shows the baseline sociodemographic characteristics of study cohort. The mean age of the 560 patients was 37.6 (±17.2) years and ranged from 12 to 94 years; 66 (11.8%) were teenagers, and 54 (9.6%) were aged 65 years or older. Of the patients, 267 (47.7%) were male and 293 (52.3%) were female. In total, 167 (29.8%) patients presented with repeated attempted suicides. Of these, 24 (14.4%) patients had made a previous attempt using a high lethality method. 184 (32.9%) were not in the labor force. In addition, 133 patients (23.8%) were living alone. There was co-ingestion of alcohol in 201 (35.9%) attempted suicides and a total of 221 patients (39.5%) reported previous psychiatric treatment.
Figure 1

Flow chart of study inclusion.

Table 1

Baseline sociodemographic characteristics and discharge outcomes of study cohort and comparison between the high lethality methods and low lethality methods groups

 

Total (n = 560)

High lethality methods (n = 89)

Low lethality methods (n = 471)

p

Age

37.6 ± 17.2

42.1 ± 19.3

36.7 ± 16.6

.02

  ≥ 65

54 (9.6)

15 (16.9)

39 (8.3)

.01

Male

267 (47.7)

39 (43.8)

228 (48.4)

.25

Reattempt

167 (29.8)

20 (22.5)

147 (31.2)

.06

Critical method history

24 (5.2)

12 (13.5)

12 (2.5)

< .01

Unemployed

184 (32.9)

39 (43.8)

145 (35.4)

.09

No family

133 (23.8)

16 (18.0)

117 (24.8)

.10

Alcohol coingestion

201 (35.9)

23 (25.8)

178 (37.8)

.02

Psychiatric history

221 (39.5)

37 (41.6)

184 (39.1)

.31

  Mood disorder

182 (32.5)

31 (34.8)

151 (32.1)

.35

  Schizophrenia

20 (3.6)

5 (5.6)

15 (3.2)

.20

  Other

21 (3.8)

1 (1.1)

20 (4.2)

.13

Death prior to discharge

50 (8.9)

39 (43.8)

11 (2.3)

< .01

Parenthesis indicates percentage.

We categorized patients into a high lethality methods group (n = 89) and a low lethality methods group (n = 471) and examined the sociodemographic characteristics of each. The average ages of patients in the high lethality methods group and the low lethality methods group were 42.1 (±19.3) and 36.7 (±16.6) years, respectively (p = .02); older patients (≥65 years) were more likely to choose high lethality methods (p = .01). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, number of previous attempted suicides, occupation, family condition, and history of past psychiatric disorders. Previous attempted suicides using high lethality methods were significantly higher in current attempted suicides using high lethality methods (p < .01). On the other hand, alcohol co-ingestion (p = .02) was significantly higher with attempted suicides using low lethality methods (Table 1).

We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to investigate the relationship between high lethality methods of attempted suicide with factors including age, previous attempted suicide using high lethality methods, and alcohol co-ingestion (Table 2). The ORs for high lethality methods were 1.02 (95% CI = 1.01 to 1.32, p < .01), 7.22 (95% CI = 3.06 to 17.04, p < .01), and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.35 to 0.99, p = .04) for age, previous attempted suicide using high lethality method, and alcohol ingestion, respectively.Finally, in the high lethality methods group, 39 patients (43.8%) died prior to hospital discharge. In the low lethality methods group, only 11 patients (2.3%) died. Compared with patients treated for self-poisoning, the ORs for completed suicides were 40.73 (95% CI = 14.22 to 116.67), 28.28 (95% CI = 12.19 to 65.62), 12.44 (95% CI = 2.20 to 70.32), and 0.60 (95% CI = 0.13 to 2.83) for patients treated for falling, hanging, drowning, and cutting or piercing, respectively (Figure 2).
Table 2

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with the use of high lethality methods for attempted suicides

Variable

Odds ratio for critical methods

95% Confidence interval

p

Age

1.02*

1.01 – 1.03

< .01

Previous high lethality methods

7.22

3.06 – 17.04

< .01

Alcohol coingestion

0.59

0.35 – 0.99

.04

*: Odds ratio per year.

Figure 2

Odds ratio for death prior to discharge by each suicide method. Each plot represents the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval compared with self-poisoning.

Discussion

The present study analyzed the sociodemographic profiles of patients who attempted suicide using high lethality methods relative to those who used low lethality methods of suicide. The overall picture that emerged was that age and previous attempted suicide using high lethality methods were independent predictors of attempted suicide using high lethality methods other than self-poisoning or cutting. On the other hand, alcohol co-ingestion before an attempted suicide was significantly associated with using a low lethality method.

Attempted suicides, especially repeated attempts, are high-risk factors for subsequent suicide [1113]. In the year following an attempted suicide, the average rate of repeated, non-fatal attempts was reported to be 17% [8]. In follow-up studies conducted 5 to 37 years after an attempted suicide, the risk of suicide was reported to be 3 to 13% [1318]. The risk for suicide among self-harming patients is estimated to be 40 times higher than among the general population [19, 20]. But, it is unclear how to identify individuals who would be at risk of subsequent suicide among suicide attempters. Of the method of attempted suicides, the high lethality methods category included hanging, drowning, the use of firearms or explosives, falling or jumping from a great height, and gassing. These methods are less commonly used, but they bear a higher mortality risk. In our study, these methods accounted for only 15.9% of total attempted suicides but for 78.0% of total deaths prior to discharge. Therefore, assessment of risk factors for choosing high lethality methods compared with other suicide methods may help in designing suicide prevention strategies.

There have been some recent attempts to uncover risk factors for hanging compared with other suicide methods. One study compared hanging suicides with all other suicides in Lithuania and reported that hanging victims were more likely to be male and rural-dwelling than other suicide victims [21]. These victims were also older and had lower education levels. In our study, patients who had made a previous attempt using a high lethality method were 7.8 times more likely to use a high lethality method again. In particular, the method used during an attempted suicide predicts a later completed suicide after adjustment for sociodemographic variables and psychiatric disorders. Therefore, intensified aftercare is warranted following attempted suicides involving high lethality methods [7]. Age was also associated with the use of high lethality methods. This is in line with the previous study that showed high risk and low rescue scores in elderly suicide attempters [22]. It is well known that acute alcohol use was associated with both attempted suicides and completions [23, 24]. Cherpitel et al. reviewed studies that included data on acute alcohol use in completed suicides and attempted suicides [24]. However, a wide range of alcohol positive cases was found: 10 to 69% for suicide and 10 to 73% for attempts. The mean percentage of alcohol use was 37% and 40% for suicide and attempt, respectively. These highly variable and uncontrolled results make it difficult to draw conclusions about the relationship between acute alcohol use and suicidal behaviors. According to our results, acute alcohol use before an attempted suicide was an independent predictor of choice of low lethality method.

Some of our findings are inconsistent with those published in the literature. Men who attempt suicide are known to engage in more dangerous methods, often resulting in severe life-threatening consequences [25, 26]. However, in contrast with previous studies, men did not use more high lethality methods in the present study. In one study regarding of annual changes in the pattern of suicide methods in Korea, the United States, and Finland, the most common suicide methods were firearm in American males and hanging in Finland male. On the other hand, self-poisoning was most common suicide method among females in both countries. Interestingly, in Korea, hanging has been the most common method of suicide among both males and females [27].

Mental disorders are predictive of suicidal behavior [28]. According to a recent meta-analysis, 4.9% of patients with schizophrenia die of suicide, most of them soon after symptom onset [29]. Additionally, those with schizophrenia tend to use highly lethal suicide methods [30]. According to the results of this study, individuals with underlying psychotic disorders are more likely than other individuals to use high lethality methods and are 2.2-fold higher. In China, a national case–control psychological autopsy study reported an overall rate of mental disorders among completed suicides of 63%, which is much lower than the rate of 90% reported in psychological autopsy studies from other countries [31]. Recent study revealed that demographic and socio-cultural risk factors for suicide in Asia are different from Western countries [28, 31, 32]. In our study, psychiatric disorders were present in 41.6% of patients in the high lethality methods group and in 39.1% of patients in the low lethality methods group. Finally, schizophrenia was not associated with high lethality suicide methods. We believe that suicide is less associated with mental illness also in Korea, and discrepancy between the present study and previous studies may come from Korea’s suicide feature.

This retrospective, single-center study has several limitations. First, we only included patients who came to the hospital to receive treatment. For this reason, some completed suicides, especially using high lethality method, may not be included in the present study. Second, the present study did not examine the patients’ attempted suicide motives, social class, marital status, or other medical illnesses. Third, the sample is relatively small and from a single hospital. For these reasons, our results should be interpreted cautiously.

Conclusions

This retrospective chart review suggests that patients who are older and have had previous attempted suicide using high lethality methods are more likely to use high lethality methods in future attempts and are more likely to have completed suicides. On the other hand, acute alcohol use before an attempted suicide was an independent predictor of choice of low lethality method.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Emergency Medicine,College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
(2)
Department of Psychiatry,College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea

References

  1. Chishti P, Stone DH, Corcoran P, Williamson E, Petridou E, EUROSAVE Working Group: Suicide mortality in the European Union. Eur J Public Health. 2003, 13: 108-114. 10.1093/eurpub/13.2.108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sharma BR, Gupta M, Sharma AK, Sharma S, Gupta N, Relhan N, Singh H: Suicides in Northern India: comparison of trends and review of literature. J Forensic Leg Med. 2007, 14: 318-326. 10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). [http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html]
  4. Statistics Korea: Annual report on the cause of death statistics. [http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/index.action]
  5. Park BC, Lester D: Rural and urban suicide in South Korea. Psychol Rep. 2012, 111: 495-497. 10.2466/12.17.PR0.111.5.495-497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim MH, Jung-Choi K, Jun HJ, Kawachi I: Socioeconomic inequalities in suicidal ideation, parasuicides, and completed suicides in South Korea. Soc Sci Med. 2010, 70: 1254-1261. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Runeson B, Tidemalm D, Dahlin M, Lichtenstein P, Långström N: Method of attempted suicide as predictor of subsequent successful suicide: national long term cohort study. BMJ. 2010, 341: c3222-10.1136/bmj.c3222.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schmidtke A, Bille-Brahe U, DeLeo D, Kerkhof A, Bjerke T, Crepet P, Haring C, Hawton K, Lönnqvist J, Michel K, Pommereau X, Querejeta I, Phillipe I, Salander-Renberg E, Temesváry B, Wasserman D, Fricke S, Weinacker B, Sampaio-Faria JG: Attempted suicide in Europe: rates, trends and sociodemographic characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989–1992. Results of the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study on Parasuicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996, 93: 327-338. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10656.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Biddle L, Donovan J, Owen-Smith A, Potokar J, Longson D, Hawton K, Kapur N, Gunnell D: Factors influencing the decision to use hanging as a method of suicide: qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry. 2010, 197: 320-325. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.076349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawton K, Williams K: Influences of the media on suicide. BMJ. 2002, 325: 1374-1375. 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1374.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Beautrais AL: Subsequent mortality in medically serious suicide attempts: a 5 year follow-up. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003, 37: 595-599. 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01236.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nordström P, Samuelsson M, Asberg M: Survival analysis of suicide risk after attempted suicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995, 91: 336-340. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09791.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Owens D, Horrocks J, House A: Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm. Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2002, 181: 193-199. 10.1192/bjp.181.3.193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Suokas J, Lönnqvist J: Outcome of attempted suicide and psychiatric consultation: risk factors and suicide mortality during a five-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991, 84: 545-549. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03191.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Moore GM, Robertson AR: Suicide in the 18 years after deliberate self-harm a prospective study. Br J Psychiatry. 1996, 169: 489-494. 10.1192/bjp.169.4.489.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jenkins GR, Hale R, Papanastassiou M, Crawford MJ, Tyrer P: Suicide rate 22 years after parasuicide: cohort study. BMJ. 2002, 325: 1155-10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1155.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Suokas J, Suominen K, Isometsä E, Ostamo A, Lönnqvist J: Long-term risk factors for suicide mortality after attempted suicide-findings of a 14-year follow-up study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001, 104: 117-121. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00243.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Suominen K, Isometsä E, Suokas J, Haukka J, Achte K, Lönnqvist J: Completed suicide after a suicide attempt: a 37-year follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2004, 161: 562-563. 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris EC, Barraclough B: Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 1997, 170: 205-228. 10.1192/bjp.170.3.205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Reulbach U, Bleich S: Suicide risk after a suicide attempt. BMJ. 2008, 337: a2512-10.1136/bmj.a2512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Starkuviene S, Kalediene R, Petrauskiene J: Epidemic of suicide by hanging in Lithuania: does socio-demographic status matter?. Public Health. 2006, 120: 769-775. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YR, Choi KH, Oh Y, Lee HK, Kweon YS, Lee CT, Lee KU: Elderly suicide attempters by self-poisoning in Korea. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011, 23: 979-985. 10.1017/S1041610211000263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, McFarland BH, Caetano R, Conner KR, Giesbrecht N, Nolte KB: Use of alcohol before suicide in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2014, 24: 588-592. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.05.008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cherpitel CJ, Borges GL, Wilcox HC: Acute alcohol use and suicidal behavior: a review of the literature. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004, 28 (5 Suppl): 18S-28S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ajdacic-Gross V, Weiss MG, Ring M, Hepp U, Bopp M, Gutzwiller F, Rössler W: Methods of suicide: international suicide patterns derived from the WHO mortality database. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86: 726-732. 10.2471/BLT.07.043489.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Värnik A, Kõlves K, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Marusic A, Oskarsson H, Palmer A, Reisch T, Scheerder G, Arensman E, Aromaa E, Giupponi G, Gusmäo R, Maxwell M, Pull C, Szekely A, Sola VP, Hegerl U: Suicide methods in Europe: a gender-specific analysis of countries participating in the “European Alliance Against Depression”. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008, 62: 545-551. 10.1136/jech.2007.065391.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Park S, Ahn MH, Lee A, Hong JP: Associations between changes in the pattern of suicide methods and rates in Korea, the US, and Finland. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014, 8: 22-10.1186/1752-4458-8-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nock MK, Hwang I, Sampson N, Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Beautrais A, Borges G, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Florescu S, Gureje O, Haro JM, Hu C, Huang Y, Karam EG, Kawakami N, Kovess V, Levinson D, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Tomov T, Viana MC, Williams DR: Cross-national analysis of the associations among mental disorders and suicidal behavior: findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2009, 6: e1000123-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer BA, Pankratz VS, Bostwick JM: The lifetime risk of suicide in schizophrenia: a reexamination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 62: 247-253. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Breier A, Astrachan BM: Characterization of schizophrenic patients who commit suicide. Am J Psychiatry. 1984, 141: 206-209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips MR, Yang G, Zhang Y, Wang L, Ji H, Zhou M: Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case–control psychological autopsy study. Lancet. 2002, 360: 1728-1736. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11681-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Vijayakumar L: Suicide and mental disorders in Asia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005, 17: 109-114. 10.1080/09540260500074735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Oh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement