Skip to main content

Table 2 Number and percentage of data documents received and analysed

From: A qualitative exploration of the recovery experiences of consumers who had undertaken shared management, person-centred and self-directed services

Data sources and types of de-identified data Total # received Percentage coded
Sources Type of de-identified data Documents Pages Documents Pages
Independent evaluator’s data (documented in in the past for PCP evaluation) Consumer interviews summary (key points) 3 3 100.00% 100.00%
Consumer interviews 3 35 66.66% 62.85%
Reports 3 37 100.00% 100.00%
Staff interviews 2 16 100.00% 100.00%
Subtotal 11 91 90.91% 85.71%
The Guides’ data (documented in the past) Personal learning 2 2 100.00% 100.00%
Organisational reports 7 7 100.00% 100.00%
Reflections on consumers progress 292 292* 83.90% 83.90%
Across four questions
a) What did I do*
b) What worked well*
c) What could I do differently*
d) Where to next*
Across the three groups
(4–7 times per group)
Reflections on four service phases 53 53* 28.30% 28.30%
Across four areas*
a) Selection phase
b) Administration of PCP**
c) Development of AP***
d) Implementation of AP
Four questions asked under each area
a) What did I do
b) What worked well
c) What could I do differently
d) Where to next
PCP reunion speeches 4 9 100.00% 100.00%
Subtotal 358 363 76.26% 76.58%
Consumers’ data (documented in the past) Action plans 16 23 100.00% 100.00%
Most important change (MIC) in my life questionnaire (1-4 times per group) 51 102 100.00% 100.00%
Recovery questionnaire 16 160 100.00% 100.00%
PCP reunion speeches 21 21 100.00% 100.00%
Subtotal 104 306 100.00% 100.00%
  Grand total 473 760 81.81% 87.10%
  1. *Data only a quarter of a page | **Person centred planning (PCP) | *** Action plan (AP).