Skip to main content

Table 2 Number and percentage of data documents received and analysed

From: A qualitative exploration of the recovery experiences of consumers who had undertaken shared management, person-centred and self-directed services

Data sources and types of de-identified data

Total # received

Percentage coded

Sources

Type of de-identified data

Documents

Pages

Documents

Pages

Independent evaluator’s data (documented in in the past for PCP evaluation)

Consumer interviews summary (key points)

3

3

100.00%

100.00%

Consumer interviews

3

35

66.66%

62.85%

Reports

3

37

100.00%

100.00%

Staff interviews

2

16

100.00%

100.00%

Subtotal

11

91

90.91%

85.71%

The Guides’ data (documented in the past)

Personal learning

2

2

100.00%

100.00%

Organisational reports

7

7

100.00%

100.00%

Reflections on consumers progress

292

292*

83.90%

83.90%

Across four questions

a) What did I do*

b) What worked well*

c) What could I do differently*

d) Where to next*

Across the three groups

(4–7 times per group)

Reflections on four service phases

53

53*

28.30%

28.30%

Across four areas*

a) Selection phase

b) Administration of PCP**

c) Development of AP***

d) Implementation of AP

Four questions asked under each area

a) What did I do

b) What worked well

c) What could I do differently

d) Where to next

PCP reunion speeches

4

9

100.00%

100.00%

Subtotal

358

363

76.26%

76.58%

Consumers’ data (documented in the past)

Action plans

16

23

100.00%

100.00%

Most important change (MIC) in my life questionnaire (1-4 times per group)

51

102

100.00%

100.00%

Recovery questionnaire

16

160

100.00%

100.00%

PCP reunion speeches

21

21

100.00%

100.00%

Subtotal

104

306

100.00%

100.00%

 

Grand total

473

760

81.81%

87.10%

  1. *Data only a quarter of a page | **Person centred planning (PCP) | *** Action plan (AP).