Table 2 Summary of PRIME ToC workshops
Country | Level | Location | Length | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethiopia | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Workshop 1. (ET1) | Community and district level representatives | Sodo* | ½ day | a Introduction to PRIME |
b Explanation of the ToC process | ||||
c Agreement on impact | ||||
d Worked forwards to development of the ToC discussing current services, needs and potential outcomes of the ToC to reach the desired impact. | ||||
Workshop 2. (ET2) | National level planners | Addis Ababa | 1Â day | a Introduction of Ethiopian mental health strategy by national ministry of health representative |
c Introduction to ToC and the ToC process | ||||
c Review and refinement of the ToC developed in ET1. | ||||
India | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Workshop 1. (IN1) | District and health Facility | Sehore* | 1Â day | a Introduction to mental health and PRIME |
b Introduction to ToC | ||||
c Mental health presentation | ||||
d Group work where each group developed the outcomes pathway for the ToC | ||||
e Feedback from group work | ||||
Workshop 2. (IN2) | District and health Facility | Sehore* | 1Â day | a Summary of IN1 |
b Group work: details of interventions and assumptions at community, health facility and health organisation level in the existing ToC map. | ||||
c Presentation and discussion of the integrated mental health care plan developed from the ToC. | ||||
Nepal | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Workshop 1. (NE1) | Health Facility and District | Chitwan* | 1Â day | a Introduction to PRIME |
b Introduction to ToC | ||||
c Agreement on long-term impact and worked the group agreed on the long term impact then worked backwards to determine the outcomes, interventions and assumptions needed to achieve this. | ||||
Workshop 2. (NE2) | National level planners | Kathmandu | ½ day | a Introduction to PRIME |
b Introduction to ToC | ||||
c ToC from NE1 was presented, reviewed and refined by the group. | ||||
Workshop 3. (NE3) | Health Facility and District | Chitwan* | ½ day | a Review of the ToC developed in NE1 and NE2 |
b Discussion of potential adaptation for specific disorder and indicators to measure outcomes. | ||||
Workshop 4. (NE4) | National level planners | Kathmandu | ½ day | c Review of the ToC refined in NE3 |
d Discussion of potential adaptation for specific disorders and indicators to measure outcomes. | ||||
South Africa | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Workshop 1. (SA1) | Health facility, district, provincial and national level representatives | Dr Kenneth Kuanda* | 2Â days | a Introduction to PRIME |
b Introduction to ToC | ||||
c Used part of the PRIME cross country ToC and worked forward adding detail to each outcome for all four disorders. | ||||
Workshop 2. (SA2) | Community | Dr Kenneth Kuanda* | 1Â day | a Introduction to PRIME |
b Introduction to ToC | ||||
c Used part of the PRIME cross country ToC and worked forward adding detail to each outcome for all four disorders. | ||||
Workshop 3. (SA3) | Health facility, district, provincial and national level representatives | Dr Kenneth Kuanda* | 1Â day | a SA1 workshop was reviewed briefly. |
| Â | Â | b Disorder specific integrated mental health care plan based on SA1 was presented and discussed in detail. | ||
| Â | Â | Â | Â | c PRIME evaluation plan and next steps were discussed. |
Uganda | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Workshop 1. (UG1) | District and health facility level | Kamuli* | 1Â day | a PRIME, mhGAP, challenges for mental health care and the ToC were introduced. |
b The impact was agreed on and the group worked backwards to develop the ToC. | ||||
Workshop 2. (UG2) | District and health facility level | Kamuli* | 1Â day | a The group was oriented to the ToC process, PRIME and planned work. |
b The ToC map from UG1 was reviewed and refined. |