Open Access

Predictors of depression among patients receiving treatment for snakebite in General Hospital, Kaltungo, Gombe State, Nigeria: August 2015

  • Abdulaziz Muhammed1, 10Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Mahmood M. Dalhat1,
  • Babalola O. Joseph1,
  • Abubakar Ahmed1,
  • Patrick Nguku1,
  • Gabriele Poggensee1,
  • Mukthar Adeiza2,
  • Garba I. Yahya1,
  • Muhammad Hamza3,
  • Zaiyad G. Habib4,
  • Abisola M. Oladimeji1,
  • Abdulsalam Nasidi5,
  • Abubakar Balla6,
  • Ibrahim Nashabaru3,
  • Nasir Sani-Gwarzo7,
  • Ahmad M. Yakasai8,
  • Joshua A. Difa9,
  • Taiwo Lateef Sheikh10 and
  • Abdulrazaq G. Habib3
International Journal of Mental Health Systems201711:26

DOI: 10.1186/s13033-017-0132-8

Received: 13 January 2017

Accepted: 29 March 2017

Published: 13 April 2017

Abstract

Background

Snakebite though neglected, affects 5 million people yearly. More neglected is the psychological effect of envenomation. We determined prevalence and pattern of depression among patients admitted into snakebite wards of Kaltungo General Hospital Nigeria, and percentage recognized by clinicians. We also assessed for factors associated with depression.

Methods

In a descriptive hospital based study, we used Patient Health questionnaire (PHQ-9) to make diagnosis of depression among the patients. We reviewed patients’ clinical records to determine clinicians’ recognition of depression.

Results

Of 187 interviews analyzed, 47 (25%) had depression with none recognized by attending clinicians. Patients with snakebite complications (odd ratio [OR] 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.5), and previous history of snakebites (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.1) were associated with mild depression. Worrying about family welfare (OR 31.5, 95% CI 6.5–152.9), financial loss (OR 14.6, 95% CI 1.8–121.5) and time loss (OR 14.6, 95% CI 1.8–121.5), past history of snakebites (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.9–36.5) and lower income (Mean difference −25,069 [84 USD], 95% CI 35,509 [118 USD]–14,630 [49 USD]) were associated with severe depression.

Conclusion

A quarter of in-patients of snakebite wards of the general hospital had comorbid depression that went unrecognized. Independent predictors of depression such as past history of snakebite, worrying about relations and having snakebite complications could help clinicians anticipate depression among patients. We recommend training of clinicians in the hospital on recognition of common psychological disorders like depression.

Keywords

Depression Snakebites Envenomation General hospital

Background

Snakebite though neglected, is an important cause of both mortality and morbidity. About 5 million people are estimated to be bitten by snakes every year, out of which 125,000 die and 400,000 permanently disabled or disfigured [1]. The burden is said to be highest in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Recently it has been estimated that between 10,000 and 100,000 snakebite envenoming occur in the West African region, with an incidence of 9–90/100,000 persons per year and an estimated 1000–10,000 deaths with a mortality rate of 0.5–6.0/100,000 persons per year [2].

More neglected than snakebite itself, is the psychological consequences resulting from experiencing an envenomation [3]. Snakebites are usually sudden and perceived as life threatening or at least a very stressful event causing severe disruption to the activities of daily living of the victim. Considering the fact that most victims of snakebite in West Africa are rural farmers who survive on subsistence farming, all of the above could serve as risk factors for the development of psychological disorders. Very few studies have been done on the development of psychiatric disorders among snakebite victims in general, and Nigeria in particular. In a study of adult patients who were victims of snakebite, the mean score on Beck’s depression inventory was significantly higher among victims of snakebites than among controls. The authors concluded that snakebite causes significant ongoing psychological morbidity, a complication not previously documented [4].

We set out to determine the prevalence and pattern of depression among snakebites victims admitted into the snakebite wards of the General Hospital Kaltungo. We identified the proportion recognized by clinicians and assessed for factors associated with depression among the patients. Finally, we determined predictors of depression among the victims in other to improve the mental health system at the general hospital Kaltungo.

We hypothesized that there are no predictors of depression among patients admitted into General hospital Kaltungo.

Method

Study setting

The study was conducted in General Hospital Kaltungo, which host the regional snakebite reference center in Kaltungo Local Government Area of Gombe State, North-Eastern Nigeria. Kaltungo is located within the Sudan savannah vegetation of the Benue river valley known for carpet vipers’ envenomation. The reference center has a 22 and 16 bed capacity male and female wards respectively.

Study design

We conducted a hospital based cross sectional study, with exploratory component.

Study population

The study population consisted of patients admitted into the snakebite ward of General Hospital Kaltungo, Gombe State during a 1-month period from the 4th of August to 4th of September 2015.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Persons admitted into the male and female snakebite wards of General Hospital Kaltungo between 4th of August and 4th of September 2015.

     
  2. 2.

    Patients aged 18 years and above.

     

Exclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Past history of depression prior to presentation in the snakebite ward for envenomation.

     
  2. 2.

    Patients too ill to answer research questionnaire.

     

Sample size determination

We calculated the minimum sample size required for the study using the Leslie and Kish formula for estimating sample size for cross-sectional study [5].
$$ {\text{n}} = \, \left( {{\text{Z}}\alpha^{ 2} {\text{pq}}} \right)/{\text{d2}} $$
where n = Minimum sample size, Zα set at 5% significant level = 1.96, p = estimates of proportion of study population with depression. We used a prevalence of 19% (0.19) symptoms of depression among persons with snake bite envenomation in a study on delayed psychological morbidity associated with snakebite envenoming [4], d = level of precision set at 5%
$$ {\text{q }} = { 1} - {\text{p }} = \, 0. 8 1 $$

The calculated sample size was 236.

We adjusted the calculated sample size for small population size. The General Hospital Kaltungo medical records indicated an average of 300 admissions per month at that time of the year. Therefore, using the formula for finite population correction,
$$ nf = \frac{n}{1 + (n)/(N)} $$
where: nf = the desired sample size when population is less than 10,000; n = the desired sample size when the population is more than 10,000; N = the average number of patients admitted per month in the male and female snakebite wards of the general hospital Katungo (N = 482) as at the time of study.
Thus
$$ nf = \frac{236}{1 + (236)/(300)} $$
Nf = 132

For this study we recruited 190 respondents.

Sampling technique

From 4th of August 2015 we consecutively recruited all snake bite patients admitted into the male and female snakebite wards of General Hospital Kaltungo who met our recruitment criteria till the achievement of our required sample size.

Study instruments

We designed a structured interviewer administered questionnaire to obtain the socio-demographic characteristics and past history of depression among the respondents. The ninth revision of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ 9) was used in assessing depression. The PHQ-9, in its original form, is a self-administered nine-item version of Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) specific to depression [6, 7]. For this study we used trained interviewers for the administration of the PHQ-9 to respondents due to low literacy rate in the area. PHQ-9 has a good test–retest reliability, criterion validity [8], and construct validity [7]. Its capacity to detect meaningful change and shorter time of administration promote its choice for our survey. The questionnaire consists of nine questions scored on a likert scale of 0–3. The aggregate score per respondent could ranges from 0 to 27 based on the answer to each of the nine questions. A cut-off score for minimal (0–4), mild [59], moderate [1014], moderately severe [1519], and severe (≥20) depression has been suggested [8]. A score of ≥10 has been shown to have an 88% sensitivity and 88% specificity for major depression in a general medical population [8]. For this study a score of 0–4 was defined as no depression, 5–9, as mild depression, 10–14 as moderate depression and >14 as severe depression. The PHQ-9 has been validated for use among Nigerian subjects [9] and has been used to diagnose mental disorders among patients at primary health care in Nigeria [10].

Data collection and procedure

We recruited as data collectors, five residents of the Nigerian Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program [11] with extensive experience with data collection from prior activities. They were trained for a period of 5 days, prior to the onset of the study, on the use of the study questionnaires and interview techniques. Data collection took place between 4th of August and 4th of September 2015. The average duration of interview was 20 min.

Data management and analysis

Data were entered into Epi info 3.3.2, cleaned and edited for inconsistencies before analysis. We summarized our findings using frequencies, means (with standard deviation) and proportions. We used Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) to check for statistically significant associations and unconditional logistic regression to check for independent predictors of psychological distress.

Ethical consideration

We obtained ethical approval and permission to conduct this study from the Ethical Committee of the Aminu Kano Teaching hospital, Kano, Nigeria and Ministry of Health, Gombe State. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants. All collected data were archived and protected within the data base of the Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (NFELTP). All snakebite patients involved in the study were treated with anti-venoms after clinical and laboratory evaluation suggested envenomation. A mental health specialist attended to patients with clinically significant psychological disorders. Participation of patients in the study was based on their willingness to be involved and were free to exit the study at any stage without compromise to their standard of care.

Results

We analyzed 187 of the 190 patients interviewed. Three were disqualified because the patients left before concluding the interview. The mean age and standard deviation of the patients was 33.8 ± 14.1 years and age ranged from 18 to 80 years.

Of the 187 patients, 136 (73%) were between the age group 20–49 years, 154 (82%) were males and 109 (58%) had no formal education. Most of the patients 134 (71%) travelled more than a 100 km before getting to the hospital with 89 (48%) spending over 8 h before reaching the hospital (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of patients admitted into snakebite wards, General Hospital Kaltungo, 2016 (n = 187)

Socio-demographic variables

Frequency

Proportion (%)

Age (years)

 <20

17

9.1

 20–49

136

72.7

 >49

34

18.2

Gender

 Male

154

82.4

 Female

33

17.6

Education

 Formal

78

41.7

 No formal education

109

58.3

Occupation

 Farming

101

54.0

 Cattle rearing

49

26.2

 Student

12

6.4

 Others

25

13.4

Average monthly income (dollars)

 Rich (>150)

48

25.7

 Average (70–150)

45

24.1

 Poor (40–69)

49

26.2

 Very poor (<40)

45

24.1

Distance to health facility (Km)

 <50

21

11.2

 50–99

32

17.1

 100–149

38

20.3

 150–199

60

32.1

 >200

36

19.3

Time taken to reach health facility (h)

 <4

54

28.9

 4–8

44

23.5

 >8

89

47.6

Previous history of snake bite

 Yes

35

18.7

 No

152

81.3

Site of snakebite

 Leg

113

60.4

 Hand

70

37.4

 Others

4

2.2

Snake type

 Carpet Viper

164

87.7

 Puff adder

5

2.7

 Cobra

4

2.1

 Not seen

14

7.5

Where was patient when bitten by snake

 At home

24

12.8

 At the farm

128

68.4

 At the stream

4

2.1

 Bush path

31

16.6

Classification of depression

 Mild

25

13.4

 Moderate

14

7.5

 Severe

8

4.3

 No depression

140

74.9

Treatment cost

 >14,400

46

24.6

 <14,400

141

75.4

Any snakebite complication

 Yes

25

13.4

 No

162

86.6

A total of 47 (25%) had a diagnosis of depression with none recognized by attending clinicians. The pattern of the depression showed that 25 (13.4%) had mild depression, 14 (7.5%) had moderate depression and eight (4.3%) had severe depression (Table 1).

Patients with snakebite associated complications (odd ratio [OR] 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.5), and patients with past history of snakebites (different from the index presentation) (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.1) were more likely to have mild depression while being a herdsman was protective (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01–0.8) (Table 2).
Table 2

Factors associated with depression among patients in snakebite wards, General Hospital Kaltungo, 2016

Characteristicsa

Mild depression

OR

95% CI

P value

Yes

No

Past household history of snakebite

 Yes

11 (22.4)

38 (77.6)

2.7

1.1

6.11

0.05

 No

14 (10.1)

124 (89.9)

    

Worried about time loss

 Yes

3 (5.2)

55 (94.8)

0.3

0.1

0.93

0.05

 No

22 (17.1)

107 (82.9)

    

Herdsmen

 Yes

1 (2.0)

48 (98.0)

0.1

0.01

0.75

0.01

 No

24 (17.4)

114 (82.6)

    

Student

 Yes

4 (33.3)

8 (66.7)

3.7

1.02

13.24

0.09

 No

21 (12.0)

154 (88.0)

    

Had complication following snake bite

 Yes

7 (28.0)

18 (72.0)

3.1

1.14

8.47

0.05

 No

18 (11.1)

144 (88.9)

    

Moderate depression

 

Yes

No

Mean diff

95% CI

P value

Total treatment cost

Mean (Std. Dev)

19,082.9 (10,174.5)

11,332.5 (11,298.9)

7750.3

1681.5

13,819.2

0.02

Severe depression

 

Yes

No

OR or Mean diff

95% CI

P value

 

Worried about financial loss

 Yes

7 (10.8)

58 (89.2)

14.6

1.75

121.49

<0.00

 No

1 (0.8)

121 (99.2)

    

Worried about time loss

 Yes

6 (10.3)

52 (89.7)

7.3

1.43

37.49

0.02

 No

2 (1.6)

127 (98.4)

    

Worried about family welfare (feeding)

 Yes

5 (35.7)

9 (64.3)

31.5

6.48

152.93

<0.00

 No

3 (1.7)

170 (98.3)

    

Past history of snakebite

 Yes

5 (14.3)

30 (85.7)

8.3

1.88

36.51

<0.00

 No

3 (2.0)

149 (98.0)

    

Mean household monthly income (Std. dev)

11,272 (10,992)

36,341 (41,613)

−25,069

−35,509

−14,630

<0.00

a Only statistically significant characteristics shown

Snakebite patients who were moderately depressed spent on the average 7750 Naira (25 USD) more, on total treatment cost and this difference was statistically significant (Mean difference 7750 [25 USD], 95% CI 1681.5 [5.6 USD]–13,819.2 [46.0]) (Table 2).

The following characteristics were significantly associated with severe depression: worrying about family welfare (OR 31.5, 95% CI 6.5–152.9), past history of snakebites (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.9–36.5), worrying about financial loss (OR 14.6, 95% CI 1.8–121.5) and worrying about time loss (OR 14.6, 95% CI 1.8–121.5). The mean monthly income of snakebite patients with severe depression was significantly lower than for those without severe depression (Mean difference −25,069[84 USD], 95% CI 35,509 [118 USD]–14,630 [49 USD]) (Table 2).

Independent predictors of mild depression were having a snakebite complication (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 2.9, 95% CI 1.0–8.0) and a past history of snakebite (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0–5.8). Independent predictors for severe depression were worrying about family welfare (AOR 23.8, 95% CI 4.6–124.4) and a past history of snakebite (AOR 5.6, 95% CI 1.1–29.2) (Table 3)
Table 3

Predictors of depression among patients in snakebite wards, General Hospital Kaltungo, 2016

Multivariate regression

95% C.I.

P value

Term

AOR

Lower

Upper

Mild depression

 Past history of snakebite (household)

2.4

1.0

5.8

0.05

 Snake bite complication

2.9

1.0

8.0

0.04

Severe depression

 Worried about family welfare (feeding)

23.8

4.6

124.4

<0.01

 Past history of snakebite (patient)

5.6

1.1

29.2

0.04

Discussion

Our study demonstrated the presence of comorbid depression among patients receiving treatment for snakebite envenomation. We found the prevalence of depression to be 25% among snakebite patients with none of the patients recognized as having depression by the attending clinicians.

We found very few peer reviewed studies on psychological disorders following snakebite envenomation worldwide and none at all in Nigeria.

The prevalence of depression (25%) in this study is lower than 50% reported by a similar study of psychological morbidity associated with snakebite envenoming [4]. The difference may be explained by their emphasis on delayed psychological morbidity. The prevalence of depression among the patients is higher than 1.1% prevalence of depression in a community survey in Nigeria [12]. The prevalence of 4.3% for severe depression in this study is higher than 2.5% reported among patients attending a general hospital in a similar cultural setting [13]. The attending physicians were unable to recognize depression in any of the patients despite about 4.3 and 7.5% having severe and moderate depression respectively. This challenge of non-recognition of psychiatric disorders by clinicians practicing in general hospital setting in Nigeria has been previously documented [14, 15]. The lack of integration of psychiatric practice into the lower levels of health care delivery in Nigeria may be responsible. This results in psychiatric services only been available in big tertiary hospitals located in state capitals [16]. Non recognition of psychiatric disorders like depression in general hospitals have been shown to lead to failure of patients to receive appropriate treatment [17, 18], increased cost of health care, length of hospital stay, readmissions and mortality and decreased quality of life [19]. Moreover non-recognition will lead to poor referral of severely ill patients to specialist psychiatric hospitals, the only source of adequate mental health care in most developing countries.

Most of the snakebites patients in this study were farmers/cattle herders (90%) and about 50% were very poor (earn <40 dollars per month) or poor (earn <70 dollars per month). Snakebites has been known to be a problem of the socioeconomically disadvantaged section of our community such as subsistence farmers and herders living in poor rural areas of Nigeria [20].

What is not yet clearly documented is whether these socioeconomic factors will also play a role in the pattern of psychological disorders among this population. In this study, snakebite patients who spent 7750 Naira (26 USD) more, on total treatment cost were more likely to have moderate depression and patients worrying about family welfare, financial and time loss to treatment were more likely to have severe depression. Moreover, the mean monthly income of snakebite patients with severe depression was significantly lower than others. All of the above could indicated that socio-economic factors play a role in the development of depression among the patients. Psychological disorders have been known to be precipitated by adverse life events [21] and it has been suggested that snakebite could be the event that tip the balance leading to development of psychological morbidities [4]. However it is also possible that the presence of the depressive disorders may be responsible for the patient spending more on treatment while on the ward. It has been shown that patients with undetected comorbid psychiatric disorders in general medical settings do spend more on health care cost [19].

Patients who developed snakebite complications were more likely to develop mild depression. Depression is known to be more prevalent among patients with medical conditions [15, 22]. The snakebite complications such as anaemia, wound infections and even limbs amputation could add to the already stressful situation of receiving treatment for snakebite envenomation.

Past history of snakebite (different from the index presentation) was a predictor of both mild and severe depression. This may again be explained by an adverse event (this time happening more than once to the same person) tipping the balance towards the development of psychological disorder. It may also be due to negative connotation given to being bitten by a snake more than once by the community. Other predictors included having a snakebite complication (mild depression) and worrying about relations (severe depression). All of this factors should raise the index of suspicion for depression among attending physicians and should ideally require additional efforts to screening for depression.

This study is a hospital based study and therefore limits the generalization of findings to the community but we are confident that the findings may apply to other snakebites victims with similar socio-cultural factors with patients from the Benue river valley such as Kaltungo.

Conclusion

We concluded that a quarter of patients admitted for snakebite envenomation in Kaltungo General Hospital had comorbid depression that was unrecognized by the attending clinician. Socioeconomic factors played a role in the development of the depression. Independent predictors of depression such as past history of snakebite, worrying about relations and having snakebite complications could help the attending clinicians anticipate depression among the patients. We recommend training of the clinicians in the hospital on recognition of common psychological disorders like depression; this may include the use of simple depression screening instruments for the detection of comorbid depression.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AM drafted the psychological arm of the protocol, and manuscript, data collection and analysis; MD involved in protocol and manuscript writing, data collection, and analysis; BJ, AA, PN, MA, GY, MH, ZH, AO, IN, NG, AY involved in data collection and analysis and manuscript editing; PN, GP, TS, AH, AN made corrections to the protocol and Manuscript; JD involve in editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

The corresponding author, AM is a consultant psychiatrist with the Federal Neuropsychiatric hospital, Kaduna. He had previously held the positions of head of research, training and statistics and head of community psychiatry of the institution. His academic qualifications include MBBS, MHPM, MPH-FE and is a fellow of the West African College of Physicians (FWACP). He is currently a medical epidemiologist with the Africa Centers for Disease control, African Union Commission, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support and contributions of Dr. MM Borodo of Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, for his support towards the conduct of this work. Many thanks to the African Field Epidemiology Network, Gombe State Ministry of Health, and Staff of Kaltungo Snakebite Centre. We also acknowledge the support of Haftom Taame of the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in final editing of the manuscript.

This work was conducted at the Kaltungo General Hospital, Gombe state of Nigeria.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained ethical approval and permission to conduct this study from the Ethical Committee of the Aminu Kano Teaching hospital, Kano, Nigeria and Ministry of Health, Gombe State. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants.

Funding

This study was supported by the Nigerian Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program
(2)
Department of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University
(3)
Department of Medicine, Bayero University
(4)
Department of Medicine, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital
(5)
Nigerian Centre for Disease Control
(6)
Kaltungo General Hospital
(7)
Port Health Services, Department of Public Health, Federal Ministry of Health
(8)
Public Health and Diagnostic Institute, College of Medical Sciences, Northwest University
(9)
Ministry of Health
(10)
Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital

References

  1. The Lancet. Snake bite—the neglected tropical disease. Lancet. 2015;386(9999):1110. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673615002470.
  2. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5(11):e218.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kasturiratne A, Pathmeswaran A, Fonseka MMD, Lalloo DG, Brooker S, de Silva HJ. Estimates of disease burden due to land-snake bite in Sri Lankan hospitals. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36(3):733–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams SS, Wijesinghe CA, Jayamanne SF, Buckley NA, Dawson AH, Lalloo DG, et al. Delayed psychological morbidity associated with snakebite envenoming. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(8):e1255.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kish L. Survey sampling. Sonsa JW, editor. New York: Wiley; 1965. p. 59–60.Google Scholar
  6. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, PHQPCSG. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA. 1999;282(18):1737–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Phelan E, Williams B, Meeker K, Bonn K, Frederick J, Logerfo J, et al. A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Adewuya A, Ola B, Afolabi O. Validity of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as screening tool for depression amongst Nigerian university students. J Affect Disord. 2006;96:89–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ogunsemi OO, Oluwole FA, Abasiubong F, Erinfolami AR, Amoran OE, Ariba AJ, et al. Detection of mental disorders with the patient health questionnaire in primary care settings in Nigeria. Ment Illn. 2010;2(1):46–50.Google Scholar
  11. Nigerian Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program. NFELTP involvement in Ebola response in Nigeria. 2014. http://www.nigeria-feltp.net/top_news.php.
  12. Gureje O, Uwakwe R, Oladeji B, Makanjuola VOEO. Depression in adult Nigerians: results from the Nigerian survey of mental health and well-being. J Affect Disord. 2010;120(1–3):158–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Salihu AS, Udofia O. Prevalence and associated factors of depression among general outpatients in a tertiary institution in Kano. Open J Psychiatry. 2016;6(July):228–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Uwakwe R. Psychiatric morbidity in elderly patients admitted to non-psychiatric wards in a general/teaching hospital in Nigeria. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:346–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohammed A, Said JM, Wakil MA, Rabbebe IB, Sheikh T, Agunbiade S. Unrecognized psychiatric disorders among adult patients admitted into a general hospital in Maiduguri, Northeastern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gureje O, Abdulmalik J, Kola L, Musa E, Yasamy MT, Adebayo K. Integrating mental health into primary care in Nigeria: report of a demonstration project using the mental health gap action programme intervention guide. BMC Heal Serv Res. 2015;15(5):242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Seltzer A. Prevalence, detection and referral of psychiatric morbidity in general medical patients. J R Soc Med. 1989;82:410–2.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Simon GE, Manning WG, Katzelnick DJ, Pearson SD, Henk HJ, Helstad CP. Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment for high utilizers of general medical care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(2):181–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawton K. The long term outcome of psychiatric morbidity undetected in general medical patients. J Psychosome Res. 1981;25:237–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Habib AG. Public health aspects of snakebite care in West Africa: perspectives from Nigeria. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2013;19(1):27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Vinokur ASM. Desirable versus undesirable life events: their relationship to stress and mental distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975;32(2):328–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Simon GE. Treating depression in patients with chronic disease: recognition and treatment are crucial; depression worsens the course of a chronic illness. West J Med. 2001;175(5):292–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement