Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of linear mixed models for changes in experienced competence and predictors (regression coefficients: R2)

From: Training frontline workforce on psychosis management: a prospective study of training effects

Subscales

Subscale 1

Subscale 2

Subscale 3

Subscale 4

Subscale 5

Subscale 6

Understanding psychoses

Building relationships

Using own reactions

Multidisciplinary collaboration

Teamwork and collaboration

Supporting relatives

Intercept

2.5840**

2.7907**

3.4252**

3.7106**

3.3962**

2.9464**

Years in training

0.7636**

0.6541**

0.1681**

0.1981**

0.1219**

0.1151**

Years in training × years in training

−0.1311**

−0.0870**

    

Individual variables

 Age group

0.0130 ns

−0.0179 ns

−0.0076 ns

−0.0083 ns

0.0285 ns

0.0369 ns

 Service level (primary/specialized)

0.1897**

0.0749**

0.0403 ns

0.0142 ns

0.0384 ns

0.1609**

 Profession

−0.0465*

−0.0242 ns

−0.0610 ns

−0.0798**

0.0162 ns

−0.0536 ns

 Length of professional education

−0.3412**

−0.2107**

−0.1328**

−0.1029*

−0.0882*

−0.1421**

 Clinical experience with SMI

0.2851**

0.3270**

0.0640 ns

0.0947**

0.0468**

0.0603 ns

 Years in training × service level

−0.0792*

     

 Years in training × education

0.1040**

     

 Years in training × clinical experience

−0.0752**

−0.0966**

    

Local program variables

 Number of students

−0.0041 ns

0.0057 ns

0.0017 ns

0.0022 ns

0.0041 ns

0.0122 ns

 Portion from primary care

−0.0022 ns

−0.0033 ns

−0.0012 ns

−0.0009 ns

−0.0004 ns

−0.0017 ns

 Dropout rate

0.0022 ns

0.0019 ns

0.0013 ns

−0.0029 ns

−0.0017 ns

0.0008 ns

Proportion of total variance explained by individual factors

 Intercept (%)

58.4

43.4

9.7

9.0

31.5

26.8

 Slopes (%)

45.3

21.7

0.7

−10.0

No random slopes

No random slopes

  1. Levels of significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
  2. R2 = regression coefficients = explained variance
  3. ns not significant